05a51129
09-12-2005
Elizabeth C. Kern, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southeast Area), Agency.
Elizabeth C. Kern v. United States Postal Service
05A51129
09-12-05
.
Elizabeth C. Kern,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Southeast Area),
Agency.
Request No. 05A51129
Appeal No. 01A52716
Agency No. 4H-335-0070-04
DENIAL
Elizabeth C. Kern (complainant) timely requested reconsideration of
the decision in Elizabeth C. Kern v. United States Postal Service,
EEOC Appeal No. 01A52716 (May 28, 2005). EEOC Regulations provide that
the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any
previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that:
(1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a
substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the
agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).
Complainant alleges in her request for reconsideration that the previous
decision included an erroneous interpretation of material fact.
Specifically, complainant states that she demonstrated that a male
employee was afforded extra time to pass his scheme during the non-peak
season of the agency while she was not.
We find that this allegation alone is not sufficient to require the
Commission to grant complainant's request for reconsideration. A �request
for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission.� Equal
Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614
(rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17. This Commission carefully considered all
of the record evidence at the time it rendered the initial decision in
question, and complainant has offered no persuasive reason as to why
these facts are material such that the decision should be reconsidered
now. After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record,
the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of
29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to
deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A52716 remains the
Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative
appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
____09-12-05______________
Date