Edward G. Hollingshed, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 10, 2002
01A20494_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 10, 2002)

01A20494_r

04-10-2002

Edward G. Hollingshed, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Edward G. Hollingshed v. United States Postal Service

01A20494

April 10, 2002

.

Edward G. Hollingshed,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A20494

Agency No. 1F-953-0019-01

DECISION

The Commission finds that the agency's October 2, 2001 decision

dismissing complainant's complaint was proper. Complainant alleges

that he was discriminated against on the bases of race, sex, age, and

retaliation when (1) on March 27, 2001, he was notified that he was

disqualified from the Associate Supervisor Program (ASP) because he

had failed a test of his writing skills; and (2) on August 13, 2001,

the Chairperson of the Associate Supervisor Review Board failed to

adhere to a verbal agreement to assist him to pass the subject test.

The verbal agreement purportedly lead to complainant's withdrawal of a

prior complaint, identified as agency no. 1F-953-0009-01. The agency

dismissed claim 1 for untimely EEO Counselor contact pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2). The agency dismissed claim 2 for failure to

state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

Regarding claim 1, the record indicates that complainant raised the same

claim in his prior complaint identified as agency number 1F-953-0009-01.

According to a letter written by complainant dated June 22, 2001, the

case was settled and complainant requested withdrawal of the complaint.

The record contains a copy of that settlement agreement dated May 22,

2001, resolving the prior complaint. Therefore, we find that claim 1 is

properly dismissed for raising the same claim that is pending or that

has been decided by the agency or Commission pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1). Since claim 1 is properly dismissed for the above cited

reason, we will not determine whether the claim was properly dismissed

on alternative grounds.

Regarding claim 2, we find that the agency should have treated

complainant's claim as a claim of breach of a May 22, 2001 settlement

agreement between the parties. The agency has failed to address

whether the agency breached the settlement agreement. The record

is insufficient to determine if the agency breached the May 22, 2001

agreement. Therefore, we shall remand the matter so that the agency may

supplement the record with evidence addressing whether it has complied

with the May 22, 2001 settlement agreement and issue a decision regarding

the breach of settlement claim.

The agency's decision dismissing claim 1 is AFFIRMED, for reasons set

forth herein. The agency's decision dismissing claim 2 is VACATED.

The matter is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance

with this decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to process claim 2 as a claim of breach of the May

22, 2001 settlement agreement. The agency shall, within 30 days of the

date this decision becomes final, supplement the record with evidence

addressing whether it has complied with the May 22, 2001 settlement

agreement and issue a decision as to whether it is in compliance with

pertinent provisions of the May 22, 2001 settlement agreement. A copy of

the decision must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 10, 2002

__________________

Date