Edward D. Washington, Complainant,v.Elaine Chao, Secretary, Department of Labor, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 10, 2006
01A62627 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 10, 2006)

01A62627

08-10-2006

Edward D. Washington, Complainant, v. Elaine Chao, Secretary, Department of Labor, Agency.


Edward D. Washington,

Complainant,

v.

Elaine Chao,

Secretary,

Department of Labor,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A62627

Agency No. 04-11-116

DECISION

Complainant appeals to the Commission from the agency's March 14, 2006

decision finding no discrimination. According to the agency's decision,

complainant alleges discrimination on the basis of race (African-American)

when, on May 12, 2004, complainant was informed that he was not selected

for the Contract Specialist, GS-1102-09 position, advertised under Vacancy

Announcement No. ETA-04-047PN.

We find that the agency articulated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason

for the nonselection. The Chief of the Division of Contract Services was

the Selecting Official (SO) for the position. As the SO explained, he

"reviewed each candidate's application, compared their knowledge, skills

and abilities with the evaluation factors" to select the best qualified

candidate. In his affidavit, the SO contrasted complainant's

qualifications with those of the selectee. For example, the SO cited the

fact that complainant "had no current experience as a contract specialist,"

and that the Federal Acquisition Regulations had changed significantly

since 1994 when complainant demonstrated his last experience as a Contract

Specialist. The SO found that complainant's description of his

qualifications only demonstrated his knowledge of the terminology, rather

than an explanation of how he performed certain functions. Moreover, the

SO stated that he had no personal knowledge of complainant's work.

In comparison, the SO had personal knowledge of the selectee's work based

on the fact that she had worked for a year as a Contract Specialist Trainee

in the Division. During that time, the selectee participated in a number

of training courses on topics, including Federal Contract Law, Federal

Contract Negotiation Techniques, Architect-Engineer Services Contracting

and Construction Contracting. In addition, the SO found that the selectee

described her knowledge, skills and abilities in greater detail than

complainant. The SO also noted that the selectee was ranked as the best

qualified candidate by the applications review panel, while complainant was

ranked second.

The Commission finds that complainant failed to rebut the agency's

articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the selection

decision. Furthermore, complainant failed to show that his qualifications

for the Contract Specialist position were plainly superior to the

selectee's qualifications or that the agency's actions were motivated by

discrimination. Complainant failed to show, by a preponderance of the

evidence, that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of race.

The agency's decision finding no discrimination is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case

if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29

C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and

arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C.

20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider

shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of

the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604.

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other

party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in

very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or

department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case

in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action

will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The

grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court.

Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within

the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil

Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 10, 2006

__________________

Date