Dwight B. Williams, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 3, 2010
0120101718 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 3, 2010)

0120101718

08-03-2010

Dwight B. Williams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.


Dwight B. Williams,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120101718

Agency No. 1H-351-0002-10

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated February 17, 2010, dismissing his formal complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

During the period at issue, Complainant was employed as a Mail Handler at the Agency's Birmingham, Alabama Post Office.

On February 4, 2010, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race, sex, and age when, on September 27, 2009, he was removed from the postal premises by agency management and was placed off the clock,1 and later, on October 27, 2009, he received a Notice of Proposed Removal. Complainant alleged the agency's actions arose from a verbal confrontation he had with a coworker, where the coworker was not similarly disciplined. In the EEO Dispute Resolution Specialist's Inquiry Report, dated February 10, 2010, Complainant's requested remedies included payment of "$300,000.00."

The record reflects that the Notice of Proposed Removal was later rescinded pursuant to a December 15, 2009 grievance settlement. There is no clear evidence when Complainant was actually returned to work, or if he was reimbursed for the pay he lost while out of work.

In its February 17, 2010 final decision, the Agency dismissed the instant formal complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) and on the alternative grounds as alleging a preliminary step to taking a personnel action, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5).

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

While the Agency dismissed the instant formal complaint for failure to state a claim and on the alternative grounds of claiming a preliminary step to taking a personnel action, the Commission determines that this matter is more properly analyzed in terms of whether it has been rendered moot. The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) provides for the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot. To determine whether the issues raised in Complainant's complaint are moot, the fact finder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said with assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998). When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

The instant formal complaint has not been rendered moot, at a minimum, because the record indicates that Complainant was out of work and lost pay as a result of the Agency's action and further reflects that Complainant has requested compensatory damages. The record does not definitively establish when Complainant was returned to work, or whether or not he was reimbursed for the pay he lost. Moreover, where, as here, a Complainant requests compensatory damages, the Agency has a duty to address the issue of compensatory damages. In this case, the Agency did not address the issue of compensatory damages. If Complainant were to prevail, the possibility of an award of compensatory damages exists, and Complainant's complaint is not moot.

Accordingly, the Agency's decision to dismiss Complainant's complaint was improper, and is hereby REVERSED. The complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 3, 2010

__________________

Date

1 It appears from the record that Complainant was off work from September 27, 2009, until at least October 3, 2009.

??

??

??

??

2

0120101718

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120101718