Drawn Metal Products Division Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Mar 1, 2010

355 NLRB No. 15 (N.L.R.B. 2010)

355 NLRB No. 15
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Drawn Metal Products Division Co. and International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agri-
cultural Implement Workers of America on its
own behalf and on behalf of UAW Local 6
Amalgamated Unit 1. Case 13–CA–45479
February 26, 2010
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN LIEBMAN AND MEMBER SCHAUMBER
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint and compliance specification.
Upon a charge filed by the Union on August 18, 2009,
the General Counsel issued the complaint and compli-
ance specification on October 21, 2009, against Drawn
Metal Products Division Co., the Respondent, alleging
that it has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
The Respondent failed to file an answer.
On December 28, 2009, the General Counsel filed a
Motion for Default Judgment with the Board. Thereaf-
ter, on December 30, 2009, the Board issued an order
transferring the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to
Show Cause why the motion should not be granted. The
Respondent filed no response. The allegations in the
motion are therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment1
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in a complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. Similarly, Section 102.56 of the Board’s Rules

1 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Chairman Liebman and Member Schaumber constitute a quorum of the
three-member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue
decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases.
See Sec. 3(b) of the Act. See Teamsters Local 523 v. NLRB, 590 F.3d
849 (10th Cir. 2009); Narricot Industries, L.P. v. NLRB, 587 F.3d 654
(4th Cir. 2009); Snell Island SNF LLC v. NLRB, 568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir.
2009), petition for cert. filed 78 U.S.L.W. 3130 (U.S. Sept. 11, 2009)
(No. 09-328); New Process Steel v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir.
2009), cert. granted 130 S.Ct. 488 (2009); Northeastern Land Services
v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed 78
U.S.L.W. 3098 (U.S. Aug. 18, 2009) (No. 09-213). But see Laurel
Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir.
2009), petition for cert. filed 78 U.S.L.W. 3185 (U.S. Sept. 29, 2009)
(No. 09-377).
and Regulations provides that the allegations in a com-
pliance specification will be taken as true if an answer is
not filed within 21 days from service of the compliance
specification. In addition, the complaint and compliance
specification affirmatively stated that unless an answer
was received by November 12, 2009, the Board may
find, pursuant to a motion for default judgment, that the
allegations in the complaint and compliance specification
are true. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Gen-
eral Counsel’s motion disclose that the Region, by letter
dated December 11, 2009, notified the Respondent that
unless an answer was received by December 18, 2009, a
motion for default judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file an answer or a response to the Notice to Show
Cause, we deem the allegations in the complaint and
compliance specification to be admitted as true, and we
grant the General Counsel’s Motion for Default Judg-
ment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation,
with an office and place of business in Niles, Illinois (the
Respondent’s facility), has been engaged in the manufac-
ture of metal parts for the automobile industry.
During the 12-month period preceding issuance of the
complaint and compliance specification, a representative
period, the Respondent, in conducting its business opera-
tions described above, purchased and received at its facil-
ity goods valued in excess of $50,000 directly from
points outside the State of Illinois and sold and shipped
from its facility goods valued in excess of $50,000 di-
rectly to points outside the State of Illinois.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement
Workers of America on its own behalf and on behalf of
UAW Local 6 Amalgamated Unit 1, the Union, is a labor
organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the
Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held
the positions set forth opposite their respective names
and have been supervisors of the Respondent within the
meaning of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the
Respondent within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the
Act:
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
Shawn Brady President, General Manager,
Owner
Kari Burns Human Resource Manager
The following employees of the Respondent (the unit)
constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the
Act:
All full-time and regular part-time production, mainte-
nance, and tool room employees employed by the Re-
spondent in its plant located at 6143 West Howard
Street, Niles, Illinois; but excluding office clerical em-
ployees, professional employees, technical employees,
confidential employees, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act.
Since about November 1, 1997, and at all material
times, the Union has been the designated exclusive col-
lective-bargaining representative of the unit and since
then the Union has been recognized as the representative
by the Respondent. This recognition has been embodied
in successive collective-bargaining agreements, the most
recent of which is effective from November 1, 1997, to
November 1, 2000, and renewed from year-to-year there-
after.
At all times since about November 1, 1997, based on
Section 9(a) of the Act, the Union has been the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the unit.
About April 29, 2009, the Respondent and the Union
reached agreement for and executed a “Plant Closing
Agreement” in anticipation of the Respondent’s intention
to terminate its business operations.
The Plant Closing Agreement provided that the provi-
sions of the collective-bargaining agreement described
above shall continue in effect until midnight of the plant
closing date.
The Plant Closing Agreement further provided that the
Respondent would continue medical insurance coverage
for employees until the plant closing date and that there-
after, unit employees would be entitled to continue cov-
erage in accordance with Federal and/or State laws.
Since about April 29, 2009, the Respondent has failed
to comply with the Plant Closing Agreement by failing to
maintain the medical insurance coverage for employees
until the plant closing date and failing to provide unit
employees the opportunity to continue such coverage in
accordance with Federal and/or State laws.
Since about April 29, 2009, the Respondent has failed
to comply with the Plant Closing Agreement by failing to
pay employees the vacation pay due them pursuant to the
Plant Closing Agreement.
Since about April 29, 2009, the Respondent has failed
to comply with the provisions of the Plant Closing
Agreement by failing to remit union dues to the Union
that were deducted from employees’ paychecks.
The subjects set forth above relate to wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit and
are mandatory subjects for the purposes of collective
bargaining.
The Respondent engaged in the conduct described
above without the consent of the Union in violation of
Section 8(d) of the Act.
About May 19 and 21, 2009, the Union, by letter, has
requested that the Respondent furnish the Union with
information pertaining to the Respondent’s business op-
erations and financial condition.
The information requested by the Union, as described
above, is necessary for, and relevant to, the Union’s per-
formance of its duties as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit.
Since about May 19 and 21, 2009, the Respondent, by
Shawn Brady, has failed and refused to furnish the Union
with the information requested by it as described above.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the conduct described above, the Respondent has
been failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the Union in violation of Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the Act. The Respondent’s unfair labor prac-
tices affect commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6)
and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and
(1) by failing, since about April 29, 2009, to continue in
effect all the terms and conditions of its Plant Closing
Agreement with the Union with respect to medical insur-
ance coverage and vacation pay, we shall order the Re-
spondent to make the employees whole by paying them
the amounts set forth in the complaint and compliance
specification, plus interest accrued to the date of payment
as set forth in New Horizons for the Retarded, 283
NLRB 1173 (1987), and minus tax withholdings required
by Federal and State laws.
In addition, having found that the Respondent has vio-
lated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing to remit to the
Union dues deducted from the paychecks of unit em-
ployees pursuant to the parties’ Plant Closing Agree-
ment, we shall order the Respondent to remit to the Un-
ion the amount set forth in the complaint and compliance
DRAWN METAL PRODUCTS DIVISION CO. 3
specification, plus interest accrued to the date of payment
as set forth in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra.
Further, having found that the Respondent violated
Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing and refusing to furnish
the Union with information that is necessary for, and
relevant to, the Union’s performance of its duties as the
exclusive collective-bargaining representative of the unit
employees, we shall order the Respondent to furnish the
Union with the information that it requested on about
May 19 and 21, 2009.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Drawn Metal Products Division Co., Niles,
Illinois, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with International Union, United Automobile,
Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America on its own behalf and on behalf of UAW Local
6 Amalgamated Unit 1, as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the employees in the unit by
failing, since about April 29, 2009, to continue in effect
all the terms and conditions of its Plant Closing Agree-
ment with the Union with respect to medical insurance
coverage and vacation pay. The appropriate unit is:
All full-time and regular part-time production, mainte-
nance, and tool room employees employed by the Re-
spondent in its plant located at 6143 West Howard
Street, Niles, Illinois; but excluding office clerical em-
ployees, professional employees, technical employees,
confidential employees, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act.
(b) Failing to remit dues to the Union that were de-
ducted from the paychecks of unit employees pursuant to
the parties’ Plant Closing Agreement.
(c) Failing and refusing to furnish the Union with in-
formation that is necessary for, and relevant to, the Un-
ion’s performance of its duties as the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of the unit employees.
(d) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Make whole the individuals named below for any
loss of earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of
the Respondent’s failure, since April 29, 2009, to con-
tinue in effect all the terms and conditions of its Plant
Closing Agreement with the Union with respect to medi-
cal insurance coverage and vacation pay, by paying them
the total amounts following their names, plus interest
accrued to the date of payment, as set forth in New Hori-
zons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987), and mi-
nus tax withholdings required by Federal and State laws:
NAME TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Anaya, Ramon $ 2,550
DeAlesio, Tony 2,908
Ferrer, Jose 1,020
Gonzales, Santiago 2,560
Ibes, John 3,060
Lijovic, Bob 2,678
Loza, Benjamin 12,596
Loza, Jose 3,156
Ly, Hao The 3,020
Puga, Julio 1,020
TOTAL BACKPAY DUE $34,568
(b) Remit to the Union all dues that were deducted
from unit employees’ paychecks pursuant to the parties’
Plant Closing Agreement that have not been remitted to
the Union, by paying to the Union $14.34, plus interest
accrued to the date of payment as set forth in New Hori-
zons for the Retarded, supra.
(c) Furnish the Union with the information that it re-
quested on about May 19 and 21, 2009.
(d) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Niles, Illinois, copies of the attached notice
marked “Appendix.”2 Copies of the notice, on forms
provided by the Regional Director for Region 13, after
being signed by the Respondent’s authorized representa-
tive, shall be posted by the Respondent and maintained
for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places including
all places where notices to employees are customarily
posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the Respon-
dent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced or
covered by any other material. In the event that, during
the pendency of these proceedings, the Respondent has
gone out of business or closed the facility involved in
these proceedings, the Respondent shall duplicate and
mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice to all cur-
rent employees and former employees employed by the
Respondent at any time since April 29, 2009.
(e) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-

2 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD4
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C. February 26, 2010
Wilma B. Liebman, Chairman
Peter C. Schaumber, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to bargain collectively
and in good faith with International Union, United
Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement
Workers of America on its own behalf and on behalf of
UAW Local 6 Amalgamated Unit 1, as the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the employees in
the unit by failing to continue in effect all the terms and
conditions of our Plant Closing Agreement with the Un-
ion with respect to medical insurance coverage and vaca-
tion pay. The appropriate unit is:
All full-time and regular part-time production, mainte-
nance, and tool room employees employed by us in our
plant located at 6143 West Howard Street, Niles, Illi-
nois; but excluding office clerical employees, profes-
sional employees, technical employees, confidential
employees, guards and supervisors as defined in the
Act.
WE WILL NOT fail to remit dues to the Union that were
deducted from the paychecks of unit employees pursuant
to our Plant Closing Agreement with the Union.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to furnish the Union with
information that is necessary for, and relevant to, the
Union’s performance of its duties as the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of the unit employees.
WE WILL NOT, in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL make whole the unit employees for any loss
of earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of our
failure, since April 29, 2009, to continue in effect all the
terms and conditions of our Plant Closing Agreement
with the Union with respect to medical insurance cover-
age and vacation pay, by paying them the amounts set
forth in the Board’s Order, plus interest accrued to the
date of payment, and minus tax withholdings required by
Federal and State laws.
WE WILL remit to the Union all dues that were de-
ducted from unit employees’ pay checks pursuant to our
Plant Closing Agreement with the Union that have not
been remitted to the Union, by paying to the Union
$14.34, plus interest accrued to the date of payment.
WE WILL furnish the Union with the information that it
requested on about May 19 and 21, 2009.
DRAWN METAL PRODUCTS DIVISION CO.