Donna L. Gordon, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 11, 2001
05A10485 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 11, 2001)

05A10485

07-11-2001

Donna L. Gordon, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area) Agency.


Donna L. Gordon v. United States Postal Service

05A10485

July 11, 2001

.

Donna L. Gordon,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area)

Agency.

Request No. 05A10485

Appeal No. 01A02500

Agency No. 4-G-770-0537-98

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Donna

L. Gordon v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A02500

(February 21, 2001). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

The Commission affirmed the agency's dismissal of the referenced

complaint, for untimely EEO contact. Specifically, the record reveals

that complainant did not contact an EEO Counselor until April 16,

1998, long past the end of the 45-day period. The record reveals

that posters explaining the EEO process were posted throughout the

building. Complainant in her request for reconsideration alleged that

these posters were never pointed out to her, and furthermore, that the

time allotted from the time a person gets to work, especially during

the probationary period, is insufficient to stop and read a single

form, let alone an entire EEO poster. Also, complainant requests

reconsideration based on the fact that her EEO Counselor contact was

only 4 days late. The record reveals that complainant failed to show

that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of law or would have a substantial impact on the policies, practices,

or operations of the agency. Complainant recognized that her contact

was untimely and she failed to present sufficient argument or evidence

to support her request for reconsideration.

After a review of the request for reconsideration, the previous decision,

and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to

meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision

of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 01A02500 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 11, 2001

__________________

Date