Denise C. Douglas, Petitioner,v.Donald E. Powell, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 26, 2004
04a30019 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 26, 2004)

04a30019

03-26-2004

Denise C. Douglas, Petitioner, v. Donald E. Powell, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.


Denise C. Douglas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

04A30019

03-26-04

.

Denise C. Douglas,

Petitioner,

v.

Donald E. Powell,

Chairman,

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,

Agency.

Petition No. 04A30019

Request No. 05991039

Appeal No. 01985384

DECISION ON PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT

The Commission has docketed the above-captioned matter to review

compliance with its decision in Denise C. Douglas v. Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation, EEOC Request No. 05991039 (November 8, 1999),

affirming the remand of one issue for processing in accord with the

Commission's regulations. EEOC Appeal No. 01985384 (July 19, 1999).

This petition for enforcement is governed by the Commission's regulations,

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503. For the reasons that follow, we find that the

agency has complied with the Order.

In EEOC Appeal No. 01985384, petitioner appealed the agency's dismissal

of her complaint, wherein she alleged discrimination based on race

(black) when (a) her application for a position was not forwarded

for consideration; and (b) she was assigned work at a higher level.

The decision affirmed the agency's dismissal of issue (a) for untimely

EEO counselor contact and remanded issue (b) for processing, finding that

petitioner's claim was an ongoing event and, therefore, timely brought to

the attention of an EEO counselor. Petitioner sought reconsideration of

the decision with regard to issue (a); the decision on request agreed

with the agency's dismissal of this issue, finding that petitioner

should have suspected discrimination when she was informed that she

was not among those deemed "best qualified" and requested her scores.

In addition, because she raised new events in her request, petitioner

was directed to contact an EEO counselor within fifteen (15) days, if

she wished to pursue new issues. See Qatsha v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05970201 (January 16, 1998).

In her Petition for enforcement, petitioner sought instruction to the

agency to produce the Report of Investigation (ROI). In addition, she

contended that the agency had not shown "good cause" for the delays in

completing the investigation and requested that the Commission sanction

the agency. In response, the agency forwarded copies of correspondence

sent to petitioner and her attorney, including a letter, dated a few weeks

after the Petition, transmitting the ROI, consisting of four volumes.

The agency explained that delays in production of the ROI were due to

petitioner's addition of many new issues and the need for at least

one supplemental investigation. The agency's records show that the

Commission's Compliance Officer and Petitioner were kept aware of

agency's activity.

The agency's letter transmitting the ROI properly informed petitioner

of her right to request a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge

or to request an immediate final agency decision. The Commission has

received no further communication from petitioner. Since the agency's

compliance has been accomplished, and the reasons for delay have been

explained, we find that the agency has complied with our order.

CONCLUSION

Based upon a review of the record and submissions by petitioner and

the agency, the Commission finds that the agency has complied with the

Order in Denise C. Douglas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,

EEOC Request No. 05991039 (November 8, 1999).

STATEMENT OF PETITIONER'S RIGHTS - ON PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Carlton Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__03-26-04________

Date