Debbie L. Fentem, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 5, 2007
0120064990 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 5, 2007)

0120064990

06-05-2007

Debbie L. Fentem, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Debbie L. Fentem,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01200649901

Agency No. 4F-852-0097-06

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated August 1, 2006, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact. In her complaint, complainant alleged that she

was subjected to discrimination on the basis of age (born in 1956) when:

1. on January 3, 2006, she was subjected to a fact-finding and she was

moved from Hopi Station to Kachina Station in Scottsdale;

2. on January 23, 2006, her mid-year pay for performance (PFP) scores

were lowered.

The record discloses that the last alleged discriminatory event occurred

on January 23, 2006, but complainant did not initiate contact with an

EEO Counselor until March 30, 2006, which is beyond the forty-five (45)

day limitation period. Complainant wrote in her complaint that she

delayed contacting an EEO counselor because she appealed her PFP score,

and was initially successful. The record does not show, however, that

this was finalized because not all the required signatures signaling

success were made. On appeal, complainant writes the discrimination

occurred on March 2, 2006. She wrote in her complaint that she learned

on this day that the initial favorable appeal determination was reversed

(meaning her PFP score would not be changed).

Utilization of an internal agency review or appeal mechanism does not toll

EEO time limits for seeking informal counseling. Hosford v. Department of

Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05890036 (June 9, 1989). See Martin

v. Department of Interior, EEOC Request No. 05910683 (October 3, 1991)

(applying Hosford where complainant appealed her job classification

to her agency and then to the Office of Personnel Management); Prince

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01A15210 (July 25, 2002)

(applying Hosford where a complainant filed a classification appeal with

her agency). Hence, waiting for results of the appeal process did not

toll the time limit to seek EEO counseling. Accordingly, the agency's

final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 5, 2007

__________________

Date

1 Due to a new Commission data system, this case has been redesignated

with the above-referenced appeal number.

??

??

??

??

2

0120064990

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120064990