David L. Cornelius, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 14, 2010
0120093518 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 14, 2010)

0120093518

01-14-2010

David L. Cornelius, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


David L. Cornelius,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093518

Agency No. 1G761004709

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated July 15, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967

(ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In a complaint dated June

29, 2009, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the bases of disability (unspecified), age (55), and reprisal for

prior protected EEO activity when since March 25, 2009 and continuing,

complainant has been required to provide documentation each time he uses

sick leave.

The agency dismissed the instant matter in accordance with EEOC Regulation

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for stating the same claim that is pending or

has been decided by the agency or Commission. Specifically, the agency

determined that in Agency No. 1G-761-0069-08 filed September 16, 2008,

complainant alleged discrimination based on race, color, sex, age and

disability when:

beginning on June 29, 2008, he has been harassed when his supervisor

made the comment, "I'll fire his ass" regarding complainant, medical

documentation was requested for his absences and talks and threats were

made to move complainant to the day shift

The agency found that the instant matter is identical to complainant's

prior complaint. The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

provides that the agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the

same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the agency

or Commission. The Commission has consistently held that in order for

a complaint to be dismissed as identical, the elements of the complaint

must be identical to the elements of the prior complaint in time, place,

incident and parties. See Jackson v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Appeal No.01955890 (April 5, 1996) rev'd on other grounds, EEOC Request

No. 05960524 (April 24, 1997).

The Commission determines that the claim raised in the prior complaint,

Agency No. 1G-761-0069-08 and the claim raised in the instant complaint

are not identical. Specifically, as complainant's attorney argues

on appeal, the record reflects that the matters raised in the prior

complaint address the agency's alleged conduct beginning in June 2008,

regarding medical documentation for absences, and also addresses a

specific comment from complainant's supervisor, and talk of reassigning

complainant to another shift. The instant matter alleges that the agency

requested medical documentation for absences beginning in March 2009.

Consequently, the Commission finds that the instant matter is not

identical to the claim filed in complainant's prior complaint.

Upon review, however, the Commission finds that the instant matter fails

to state a claim. The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

provides, in relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint

that fails to state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from

any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he

or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race,

color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition.

29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case

precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a

present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of

employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air

Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

Here, complainant has failed to demonstrate that the agency's alleged

conduct resulted in any specific adverse action. The record does not

indicate that he was disciplined, or denied leave as a result of the

agency's actions. Moreover, complainant has failed to demonstrate

that the agency's alleged conduct was so severe and pervasive that it

altered the conditions of complainant's employment. In that regard,

we find that the instant matter is appropriately dismissed for failure

to state a claim.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29

U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the

sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the

Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 14, 2010

__________________

Date

2

0120093518

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120093518