01a02405
02-08-2002
David Jones, Complainant, v. Elaine Chao, Secretary, Department of Labor, Agency.
David Jones v. Department of Labor
01A02405
February 8, 2002
.
David Jones,
Complainant,
v.
Elaine Chao,
Secretary,
Department of Labor,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A02405
Agency No. CRC 100-CA-007
DISMISSAL
By letter dated January 27, 2000, David Jones (complainant), an employee
of the United States Postal Service (USPS), through his counsel,
sought to file an appeal with this Commission from a January 21, 2000,
letter of the Department of Labor (DOL), dismissing a complaint for
lack of jurisdiction. Complainant had addressed DOL claiming that the
Office of Workers Compensation Programs (OWCP) improperly divulged
medical information to his employer, USPS. DOL advised complainant
that it lacked jurisdiction with regard to OWCP's handling of claims,
including its alleged claim of improper sharing of medical information.
In addition, DOL explained that its jurisdiction under the Rehabilitation
Act over DOL programs, as set forth in its implementing regulations,
29 C.F.R. Part 33, was limited to claims of differential treatment
based on disability where the complaining party has met the threshold
requirement to demonstrate that s/he is a "qualified disabled person"
within the meaning of the Act and that complainant's claim did not meet
that criterion.
Apparently believing that the Commission has jurisdiction over DOL's
action, he filed the instant matter. The Commission's regulations at
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 implement its federal sector complaint processing.
Appeals may be filed with the Commission from an agency's final action
on a complaint made by an employee or applicant for employment pursuant
to these regulations. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.401(a). With regard to this
matter, complainant has no employment relationship with DOL. For these
reasons, it is DISMISSED.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
February 8, 2002
__________________
Date