Curtis L. Sowell, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 31, 2001
01991103_r (E.E.O.C. May. 31, 2001)

01991103_r

05-31-2001

Curtis L. Sowell, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Curtis L. Sowell v. United States Postal Service

01991103

May 31, 2001

.

Curtis L. Sowell,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01991103

Agency No. 4D-290-0103-98

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the October 23,

1998 final agency decision dismissing one of two claims raised in his

formal complaint. The claim that was dismissed, for untimely EEO

Counselor contact, addressed the agency's purported failure to select

him for a vacant clerk position on June 20, 1998.<1>

On August 26, 1999, complainant filed a civil action (identified as

Civil Action No. 4-99-2875-24BF) in the United States District Court for

the District of South Carolina. The record further discloses that the

claims raised therein (relating to non-selections for clerk positions

in June and August 1998) are the same as the two claims raised in

the instant complaint. The regulation found at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409

provides that the filing of a civil action "shall terminate Commission

processing of the appeal." Commission regulations mandate dismissal

of the EEO complaint under these circumstances so as to prevent

a complainant from simultaneously pursuing both administrative and

judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting resources, and creating

the potential for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, and in order

to grant due deference to the authority of the federal district court.

See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079

(May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513

(October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October

25, 1988). Accordingly, complainant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 31, 2001

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1 The claim that was accepted for investigation addressed the agency's

failure to select him for another vacant clerk position on August

3, 1998. In a final decision dated May 17, 1999, the agency found no

discrimination regarding this matter. Complainant did not appeal the

May 17, 1999 decision.