Corey J. Brown, Complainant,v.Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 27, 2012
0120113903 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 27, 2012)

0120113903

01-27-2012

Corey J. Brown, Complainant, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation), Agency.




Corey J. Brown,

Complainant,

v.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice

(Federal Bureau of Investigation),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120113903

Agency No. FBI201100052

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated July 21, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was an

applicant for employment with the U.S. Secret Service.

On February 3, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that

the Agency, through its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), subjected

him to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American) and reprisal

for prior protected EEO activity by sharing negative information with

the Secret Service about a polygraph test he took that was administered

by the FBI in April 2009. Complainant alleged that this information

resulted in his non-selection for the position at the Secret Service in

October 2009. Complainant also alleged that he had filed an earlier EEO

complaint against the FBI concerning the administration of the polygraph

which was still pending at the time the negative polygraph information

was sent to the Secret Service. It is for filing this earlier complaint

that Complainant alleges he was retaliated against.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact, asserting Complainant

was not selected for the Secret Service position in October 2009, but

did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until October 4, 2010,

a year later.

The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

In pertinent part, the EEOC Regulation found at 29 C.F.R. §

1614.107(a)(2) allows an agency to dismiss a complaint that fails to

comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of an EEO Counselor

within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be

discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five

(45) days of the effective date of the action. The Commission has adopted

a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed to a "supportive facts"

standard) to determine when the forty-five (45) day limitation period is

triggered. See Howard v. Dep’t of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970852

(February 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation is not triggered until

a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination, but before all the

facts that support a charge of discrimination have become apparent.

The record in this case confirms the Agency’s assertion that Complainant

did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until nearly one year

after he was notified that he had not been selected for a position with

the Secret Service. Complainant, however, argues that he could not

have reasonably suspected the FBI’s discriminatory participation in

his non-selection until after he submitted a Freedom of Information Act

(FOIA) request to obtain the reasons for his non-selection. He did not

receive a response to his FOIA request until September 2010 and discovered

that the FBI shared the results of his polygraph, which he felt was in

retaliation for the EEO complaint he filed relating to the polygraph.

He contacted an EEO Counselor within several weeks of receiving the FOIA

response, and well within 45 days.

Based on these facts, we are persuaded that Complainant was not aware

of the FBI’s role in his non-selection by the Secret Service until he

received the September 2010 FOIA response. As such, Complainant did not

develop a reasonable suspicion of discrimination/retaliation by the FBI

until that time, and then promptly sought EEO counseling.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED for further processing

as set forth in the Order below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the

Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall

issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue

a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant’s

request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File A Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 27, 2012

__________________

Date

2

0120113903

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120113903