0120140614
04-11-2014
Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Southwest Area), Agency.
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Southwest Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120140614
Agency No. 4G720008113
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated October 21, 2013, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a City Carrier at the Agency's MPO facility in El Dorado, Arkansas.
On October 4, 2013, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American), disability and reprisal when, on May 17, 2013, he was denied a reasonable accommodation and was placed off the clock.
The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for failure to raise the matter in the complaint with an EEO counselor. The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint or portion thereof which raises a matter that has not been brought to the attention of an EEO counselor, or is not "like or related" to a matter on which the complainant has received counseling.
According to EEO counseling report in this case, Complainant claimed he was denied continuation of pay (COP) benefits for an on-the-job injury from May 15-25, 2013.
In his formal EEO complaint, Complainant stated that the Agency retaliated against him for seeking EEO counseling concerning the alleged discriminatory handling of his workers' compensation claim. Specifically, Complainant alleged that he was not allowed to return to work until he was medically able to work an eight-hour shift. Essentially, he appears to be alleging that the Agency denied him a reasonable accommodation by refusing to allow him to work reduced hours until he was medically able to return to work full-time.
While Complainant did not specifically raise the denial of reasonable accommodation during counseling, it is clear that this claim is sufficiently related to the claim he sought counseling for. The events all arise out of the same factual background - management's treatment of him with respect to his May 2013 on-the-job injury. Significantly, Complainant has alleged that he was denied reasonable accommodation (put off work rather than being allowed to work a reduced schedule within his medical restrictions) in retaliation for seeking counseling on the COP benefits. We find that the Agency should have accepted Complainant's reasonable accommodation claim (both disability discrimination and retaliation) because it is sufficiently related to the matter he raised in counseling.
However, to the extent Complainant is challenging the Agency's refusal to pay him COP as ordered by the Office of Worker's Compensation Programs (OWCP), such matters are not within the Commission's jurisdiction. Complainant should raise his concerns with the Department of Labor not the Commission.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is REVERSED and the complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing pursuant to the following Order.
ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (denial of reasonable accommodation based on disability discrimination and unlawful retaliation) in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq.. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)
This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and
the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
April 11, 2014
__________________
Date
2
0120140614
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120140614