Complainantv.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (New York Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 29, 2014
0520140099 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 29, 2014)

0520140099

04-29-2014

Complainant v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (New York Metro Area), Agency.


Complainant

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(New York Metro Area),

Agency.

Request No. 0520140099

Appeal No. 0120121393

Hearing No. 520-2011-00010X

Agency No. 4B-020-0062-10

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121393 (November 1, 2013). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).

Complainant filed an EEO complaint that alleged that the Agency discriminated against him on the bases of disability and age when:

1. On April 6, 2010, Complainant received a Letter of Warning for Failure to Perform Duties in a Satisfactory Manner;

2. On April 13, 2010, Complainant received an Emergency Off Duty No Pay Placement;

3. On April 13, 2010, Complainant was issued a Notice of Suspension of 7 Calendar Days for Failure to Perform Duties in a Satisfactory Manner/Failure to Follow Instructions; and

4. On April 13, 2010, the Complainant's manager threatened him and enabled a hostile work environment.

The Agency dismissed claim 4 on the basis that it failed to state a claim. Regarding claims 1, 2, and 3, the Agency found that Complainant failed to prove that the Agency subjected him to unlawful discrimination. In our previous decision, the Commission noted that Complainant sought to amend his complaint to include additional claims of harassment, but the Agency failed to address Complainant's request to amend his complaint. The Commission further found that the alleged additional incidents of harassment were like and related to claim 4, and thus, the complaint should have been amended to include these alleged claims of harassment. Therefore, the Commission remanded claim 4, as amended, to the Agency for further processing. Additionally, the Commission affirmed the Agency's findings with respect to claims 1, 2, and 3.

In his request for reconsideration, Complainant contends that management has a strong bias against disabled individuals. Complainant further contends that management did not like the fact that he refused to deliver in unsafe conditions and, therefore, disciplined him on fabricated charges.

Upon review, we note that Complainant's arguments were reviewed and considered by the Commission on appeal. We further note that a "request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission." Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (rev. Nov. 9, 1999), at 9-17; see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agriculture, EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the previous decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121393 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim 4 in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0610)

This decision affirms the Agency's final decision/action in part, but it also requires the Agency to continue its administrative processing of a portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 29, 2014

Date

2

0520140099

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520140099