Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Headquarters), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 30, 2015
0120151173 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 30, 2015)

0120151173

04-30-2015

Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Headquarters), Agency.


Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Headquarters),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120151173

Agency No. 4X048004914

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated January 6, 2015, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination alleging a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Customer Care Agent at the Agency's Customer Care Center facility in Los Angeles, California.

On November 12, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when, between August 13, 2014 and September 26, 2014, her schedule was tampered with on a weekly basis and her time was erased.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7), for failure to provide relevant information. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7) provides for the dismissal of a complaint where the agency has provided the complainant with a written request to provide relevant information or otherwise proceed with the complaint, and the complainant has failed to respond to the request within 15 days of its receipt or the complainant's response does not address the agency's request, provided that the request included a notice of the proposed dismissal. The regulation further provides that, instead of dismissing for failure to cooperate, the complaint may be adjudicated if sufficient information for that purpose is available.

The Agency's EEO office contacted Complainant by letter dated December 16, 2014, asking her to clarify her claims. The Agency asked her to explain how her schedule was tampered with, the effect this had on her work hours, and the dates her time was erased. The Agency's letter warned Complainant that failure to provide the requested information might result in the dismissal of her complaint.

In response to the Agency's request, as well as on appeal, Complainant did not provide the requested information, but rather stated that the requested information would be developed during the investigation.

We agree with the Agency that the complaint was vague and lacked specificity. Complainant did not clarify her claims when asked to do so. We also note that the EEO counseling report indicates that the management officials Complainant identified in her complaint as responsible for the alleged actions did not supervise Complainant's unit, adding to the confusion about her claims. The Agency properly complied with the 1614 regulations by sending Complainant a written request to clarify her claims before dismissing the complaint and warning her of consequences for failing to provide the requested information. It is also clear from the record that while Complainant responded to the Agency's letter, she failed to provide any of the requested information, indicating it would be provided during the investigation into her complaint. Under these circumstances, we do not find the Agency erred in dismissing the complaint.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and

the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 30, 2015

__________________

Date

2

0120151173

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120151173