Complainantv.Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 18, 2014
EEOC Appeal No. 0120141044 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 18, 2014)

EEOC Appeal No. 0120141044

12-18-2014

Complainant v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.


Complainant,

v.

Jeh Johnson,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security

(Citizenship and Immigration Services),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120141044

Agency No. HSCIS018532013

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated December 18, 2013, dismissing a formal complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

During the period at issue, Complainant applied for the position of an Immigration Services Officer, GS-1801-07, at the Agency's facility in Laguna Niguel, California.

On November 13, 2013, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of national origin and parental status1 when:

On July 10, 2013, Complainant's offer of employment as an Immigration Services Officer, GS-1801-07, under vacancy announcement CIS-PJN-775220- WSC, was rescinded.

On December 18, 2013, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing the formal complaint for failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The Agency determined that Complainant's offer of employment was rescinded because he "failed to meet the suitability requirements regarding his background investigation." Therefore, the Agency determined that

Complainant was not aggrieved. The Agency further concluded that dismissal of the complaint was appropriate because the formal complaint was a collateral attack on another proceeding.

The instant appeal followed. On appeal, Complainant argues that he was fully qualified for the position and that his "national origin played a role..." in the employment offer rescission.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1) provides for the dismissal of a complaint which fails to state a claim within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. �1614.103. In order to establish standing initially under 29 C.F.R. �1614.103, a complainant must be either an employee or an applicant for employment of the agency against which the allegations of discrimination are raised. In addition, the claims must concern an employment policy or practice which affects the individual in his or her capacity as an employee or applicant for employment. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103; �1614.106(a). The Commission's Federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

Complainant claimed that the Agency discriminated against him when it decided to rescind its offer of employment to him. The issue of Complainant's rescinded employment offer addresses a claim of personal injury or harm to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Ali v. Department of Homeland Security, EEOC Request No. 0120101042 (June 17, 2010). In determining that the offer of employment was rescinded because Complainant failed to meet the suitability requirements for the position, the Agency has addressed the merits of Complainant's complaint without a proper investigation as required by the regulations. Here, the Agency's articulated reason for the action in dispute is irrelevant to the procedural issue of whether he has stated a justiciable claim under Title VII. See Osborne v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05960111 (July 19, 1996); Lee v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930220 (August 12, 1993); Ferrazzoli v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05910642 (August 15, 1991).

Moreover, we do not find that the subject claim constitutes a collateral attack on another forum, as determined by the Agency in its final decision. A claim that can be characterized as a collateral attack, by definition, if it involves a challenge to the proceedings that occurred within the adjudicatory process of another forum, such as the grievance process, the unemployment compensation process, or the workers' compensation process. See Fisher v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05931059 (July 15, 1994) (challenge to agency's appeal within the workers' compensation process fails to state a claim as an EEO complaint); Lingad v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930106 (June 23, 1994) (challenge to evidentiary ruling in grievance process fails to state a claim as an EEO complaint). The Agency has failed to establish that this was the case in the instant complaint.

CONCLUSION

The Agency's final decision dismissing the formal complaint is REVERSED. The formal complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (on the basis of national origin) in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 18, 2014

__________________

Date

1 Being a parent is not a basis for discrimination that is recognized under any statute that the Commission enforces, and will not be further addressed in this decision.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120141044

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120141044

6

0120141044