Complainant,v.Deborah Lee James, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 30, 2015
0120143120 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 30, 2015)

0120143120

01-30-2015

Complainant, v. Deborah Lee James, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Complainant,

v.

Deborah Lee James,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120143120

Agency No. 9V1M14085

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated July 25, 2014, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Welder at the Agency's facility at Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma.

On July 15, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian), sex (male), religion (Catholic), color (White), and age (48) when, on August 30, 2012, Complainant read sexually offensive emails dated April 5 and April 14, 2012. The emails were sent between his wife and a military person from another office, using their personal email addresses.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal followed without comment.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

Complainant alleged he read the offensive emails on August 30, 2012. Complainant does not assert that he was unaware of the time limits for contacting an EEO counselor. Indeed, after he contacted the Inspector General regarding the matter, he was given the telephone number of the EEO office in December 2012.1 However, Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until May 7, 2014, which is well beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 30, 2015

__________________

Date

1 Complainant felt there was an unprofessional relationship between the military person (a Lieutenant) and his wife, who was a Naval reserve officer. To the extent his complaint deals with military matters and military discipline concerning such relationships, our regulations do not provide us with jurisdiction over military matters. We note that the emails in question were to and from personal email accounts and did not involve the use of government resources.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120143120

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120143120