Chester Campbell, Complainant,v.Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 5, 2005
01a53638 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 5, 2005)

01a53638

08-05-2005

Chester Campbell, Complainant, v. Gordon R. England, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Chester Campbell v. Department of the Navy

01A53638

08-05-05

.

Chester Campbell,

Complainant,

v.

Gordon R. England,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A53638

Agency No. 04-4523A-09011

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to the

untimely filing of the formal complaint, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1),

for failure to state a claim. In his complaint, complainant alleged that

he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of disability (displaced

hip and herniated disc) when, (1) on August 20, 2002, Shop 06M placed him

in the injured workers program instead of placing him within Shop 06M; and

on the basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity when, (2) on September 22,

2004, he was counseled not to use e-mail to communicate with his foreman.

With respect to claim (1), the record discloses that complainant's

attorney received the notice of right to file a formal complaint on

July 2, 2004. Although the notice indicated that complainant had

to file a formal complaint within fifteen (15) calendar days of its

receipt, complainant did not file his formal complaint until August 4,

2004, which is beyond the limitation period. We note that 29 C.F.R. �

1614.605(d) provides that service of all official correspondence shall

be made on the attorney and complainant, but time frames for receipt of

materials shall be computed from the time of receipt by the attorney.

On appeal, complainant has not offered any justification to warrant

an extension of the time limit for filing the complaint. Accordingly,

the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed claim (1).

With respect to claim (2), 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1) requires an

agency to dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103;

�1614.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long

defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or

loss with respect to a term, condition or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Here, while the record reflects

that the agency counseled complainant not to use e-mail to communicate

with his foreman, we do not find that this action rendered complainant

aggrieved or that it had a chilling effect on complainant's use of the

EEO process. We therefore find that the agency properly dismissed claim

(2) for failure to state a claim.

For the foregoing reasons, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

___08-05-05_______________

Date