Charles Kennedy, Complainant,v.Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 28, 2008
0120080746 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 28, 2008)

0120080746

03-28-2008

Charles Kennedy, Complainant, v. Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Charles Kennedy,

Complainant,

v.

Michael W. Wynne,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080746

Agency No. 9X1M07051

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated October 9, 2007, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

In a complaint dated September 7, 2007, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when, on

June 14 and July 5, 2007, he received two proposed mediation settlement

agreements containing "unlawful conditions." Specifically, complainant

objected to language requiring him to withdraw his pending EEO complaints

and waive any other legal claims he may have had relating to the events

at issue in his complaints in exchange for the actions of the agency

promised in the settlement agreements. The proposed agency actions

included granting complainant a permanent reassignment, restoration of

leave, altering a performance appraisal, and removing negative comments

from his personnel folder.

EEOC regulations provide that an agency shall accept a complaint from any

aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or

she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color,

religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). If complainant does not allege

facts that indicate he is aggrieved, his complaint may be dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

In the instant case, the Commission finds that the complaint fails to

state a claim. The only issue raised in the complaint is a challenge

to the language in the proposed settlement agreements. Without more,

complainant has not alleged personal harm for which there is a remedy

under the law. The Commission has long held that a complainant

may validly waive those claims arising from discriminatory acts or

practices which antedate the execution of a settlement agreement.

Vigil v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05960521 (June 22,

1998), (citing Bimes v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970359

(March 27, 1997). There is nothing in this case which suggests that

agency was asking complainant to sign an agreement that waives prospective

Title VII rights.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint for failure to state a claim is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 28, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120080746

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120080746