Carolyn Bennett, Complainant,v.Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 13, 2001
01994476_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 13, 2001)

01994476_r

07-13-2001

Carolyn Bennett, Complainant, v. Thomas E. White, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Carolyn Bennett v. Department of the Army

01994476

July 14, 2001

.

Carolyn Bennett,

Complainant,

v.

Thomas E. White,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01994476

Agency No. AVEUFO9902J0030

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO contact.<1> Complainant alleged that she was discriminated against

on the basis of disability when her supervisor from November 1995 to

January 1998 perceived that she was mentally ill and took a number of

actions against her related to her perceived illness.

The record indicates that the alleged discriminatory events occurred

while complainant worked under her former supervisor from November 1995

until January 1998, and that she knew or should have known of the claimed

discrimination more than forty-five days prior to her January 22, 1999 EEO

Counselor contact, thus making her contact untimely. Although complainant

asserts on appeal that her October 26, 1998 EEO Counselor contact for

a previous complaint should be considered, she has not shown her claims

to be timely under the earlier EEO Counselor contact date. Similarly,

complainant has also failed to show that other issues she believes were

not properly considered in the agency's decision were timely raised.

Accordingly, as complainant has offered no persuasive arguments or

evidence to warrant an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO

contact, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 13, 2001

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1The agency also dismissed most of complainant's numerous claims on the

alternative bases of failure to raise the issue with an EEO Counselor,

or as stating the same claim as that pending before or decided by

the agency. As complainant's claims were properly dismissed under 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), we do not address the agency's alternative

bases for dismissal.