Carleton Hoffman, Appellant,v.Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 25, 1998
05960736 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 25, 1998)

05960736

11-25-1998

Carleton Hoffman, Appellant, v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Carleton Hoffman v. United States Postal Service

05960736

November 25, 1998

Carleton Hoffman, )

Appellant, )

) Request No. 05960736

v. ) Appeal No. 01952049

) Agency No. 1F-941-1044-94

Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., ) Hearing No. 370-94-2630X

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On July 23, 1996, Carleton Hoffman (hereinafter referred to as the

appellant) timely initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (the Commission) to reconsider the decision in Carleton

Hoffman v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster General, United States

Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01952049 (June 20, 1996). The appellant

received the decision on June 24, 1996. EEOC regulations provide that

the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous

decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). A party requesting reconsideration

must submit written argument or evidence which tends to establish one or

more of the following criteria: new and material evidence is available

that was not readily available when the previous decision was issued,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous decision involved an erroneous

interpretation of law, regulation or material fact, or misapplication of

established policy, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); the decision is of such

exceptional nature as to have substantial precedential implications,

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the appellant's request for reconsideration, the

agency's reply thereto, the previous decision, and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the appellant's request fails to meet the criteria

of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to

deny the appellant's request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01952049

(June 20, 1996) remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on a decision of the Commission

on a Request for Reconsideration.

STATEMENT OF APPELLANT'S RIGHTS - ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0993)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

NOV 25, 1998

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat