Carl W. Boykin, Complainant,v.Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 9, 1999
01A05530 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 9, 1999)

01A05530

11-09-1999

Carl W. Boykin, Complainant, v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency.


Carl W. Boykin v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

01A05530

.

Carl W. Boykin,

Complainant,

v.

Donna E. Shalala,

Secretary,

Department of Health and Human Services,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A05530

Agency No. ACF-012-00

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency's

decision dated July 26, 2000, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.<1> The Commission

accepts the appeal in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

By letter dated November 29, 1999, the agency informed complainant

that it consolidated three of his pending complaints pursuant to the

Commission's new regulations, and that they were being forwarded to an

EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) for a hearing. The agency additionally

informed complainant that he was entitled to amend his consolidated

complaint with like or related claims, and also that he could request

consolidation of certain claims in the pre-complaint stage with his

three consolidated complaints.

By letter dated December 10, 1999, complainant contacted the EEOC's

Washington Field Office, requesting amendment of his consolidated

complaints by adding three additional issues. Two of these issues

comprise the claims in the instant complaint, namely his non-selection

under vacancy announcement ACF-99-C-039 and the agency's purported

refusal to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

regarding this non-selection. The record is then devoid of any indication

of the disposition of this request by either the AJ or the agency.

Next, the record shows that complainant contacted an EEO counselor on

February 24, 2000, and filed the instant complaint on May 10, 2000.

The agency then dismissed the complaint, finding that complainant had

failed to establish timely EEO contact regarding the non-selection

claim, and that the FOIA claim did not fall within the purview of the

Commission's regulations.

On appeal, in pertinent part, complainant argues that the dismissal was

improper because he had requested that his consolidated complaint pending

before the AJ be amended to include the claims in his instant complaint.

Complainant further argues that the agency was well aware of this,

and dismissed the instant complaint as an act of reprisal.

After careful review, we find that the agency improperly dismissed the

instant complaint. As noted above, the record confirms that complainant

requested that the AJ amend his pending complaint to add the claims

presented in the instant complaint. Because there appears to have been no

formal decision regarding this request, we find that the agency decision

was improperly issued and that the matter must be REMANDED back to the

agency further processing.

Accordingly, we VACATE the agency's decision, and REMAND the case back

to the agency for action consistent with the ORDER below.

ORDER

The agency is to transmit the entire complaint file, including both

of complainant's appeal statements and supporting documentation, as

well as a copy of this decision, to the AJ assigned to EEOC Hearing

No. 100-A0-7243X,<2> and request a determination on complainant's December

10, 1999 request to amend his consolidated complaints with the claims in

the instant complaint. The AJ shall process this request in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109.

The agency is directed to submit the above described copy of the complaint

file to the EEOC Hearings Unit at the Washington Field Office within

fifteen (15) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final.

The agency shall provide written notification to the Compliance Officer at

the address set forth below that the complaint file has been transmitted

to the Hearings Unit.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2As of the issuance date of this decision, this case is still pending

at the Washington Field Office.