Brown-Saltman Furniture Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 25, 1938

7 N.L.R.B. 1174 (N.L.R.B. 1938)

In the Matter of BROWN-SALTMAN FURNITURE COMPANY and UNITED
FURNITURE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL No. 576, C. I. O.
Case No. R-80-3.-Decided June 25, 1938
Furniture Manufacturing Industry-Investigation of Representatives : contro-
versy concerning representation of employees-Contracts : no b-r to investigation,
where period for renewal is at hand-Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargain-
ing: production employees , excluding clerical and supervisory employees ; no
controversy as to-Representatives : proof of choice : comparison of pay roll with
union membership cards-Certification of Representatives : upon proof of major-
ity representation.
Mr. William R. Walsh and Mr. Charles M. Brooks, for the Board.
Mr. Spencer Austrian, of Los Angeles, Calif., for the Company.
Gallagher, Wirin cf Johnson, by A. L. Wirin, of Los Angeles, Calif.,
for the C. I. O.
Mr. Arthur Garrett, by Mr. Francis C. Jones, of Los Angeles, Calif.,
for Local No. 1561, for District Council, and for the Brotherhood.
Mr. Otto J. Emme, of Los Angeles, Calif., for Local No. 15.
Mr. A. J. Toth, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On April 22, 1938, United Furniture Workers of America, Local
No. 576, Committee for Industrial Organization, herein called the
C. I. O., filed with the Regional Director for the Twenty-first Region
(Los Angeles, California) a petition alleging that a question affecting
commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of
Brown-Saltman Furniture Company, Southgate, California, herein
called the Company, and requesting an investigation and certification
of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On April 27, 1938,
the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting
pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of
National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as
amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Direc-
tor to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due
notice.
1174
DECISIONS AND ORDERS 1175
On May 11, 1938, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing,
copies of which were duly served upon the Company, upon the C. I. 0.,
upon Upholsterers, Carpet, and Linoleum Mechanics Union, Local
No. 15, herein called Local No. 15, upon United Brotherhood of Car-
penters and Joiners of America, Local No. 1561, herein called Local
No. 1561, upon District Council of Carpenters for Los Angeles County,
herein called District Council, and upon United Brotherhood of Car-
penters and Joiners of America, herein called the Brotherhood, the
latter four, herein collectively called the A. F. of L. Affiliates, being
labor organizations claiming to represent employees directly affected
by the investigation. Pursuant to the notice, a hearing was held on
May 23 and 24, 1938, at Los Angeles, California, before Thomas H.
Kennedy, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Board. The
Board, the Company, the C. I. 0., and the A. F. of L. Affiliates were
represented by counsel and participated in the hearing. Full oppor-
tlpnity to be heard, to examine and to cross-examine witnesses, and to
introduce evidence bearing On the issues was afforded all parties.
-During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several
rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence.
The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds
that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby
affirmed.
:Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Brown-Saltman Furniture Company, individually owned and oper-
ated by David J. Saltman, is engaged in the manufacture of dining
room, living room, and bedroom furniture. The Company's sales
clni ing 1937 amounted to $411,220 04, approximately 18 per cent of
which were shipped out of the State of California. During the same
year, the Company purchased raw materials valued at $170,364.79,
consisting of hardware of all sorts, upholstering fabrics, twine,
springs, filling such as cotton, hair, moss, and mirrors. A small
auiount of these materials are procured by the Company directly
from sources outside the State; the remainder through jobbers whose
sources of supply are located in other States and territories of the
United States.
H. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
United Furniture Workers of America, Local No. 576, is a labor
organization affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organiza-
tion. It admits to its membership ill production employees of the
106791-38-vo1 vu-75
1176 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Company, excluding office workers and clerical and supervisory
employees.
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local
No. 1561, is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federa-
tion of Labor and with the District Council of Carpenters for Los
Angeles County. Local No. 1561 admits to membership all production
employees of the Company, except upholsterers, supervisors, and
clerical employees. District Council of Carpenters of Los Angeles
County is a labor organization consisting of locals of the United
Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America within the Los
Angeles area.
Upholsterers, Carpet, and Linoleum Mechanics Union, Local No. 15,
is a labor organization affiliated with the American Federation of
Labor. It admits to membership all the upholsterers of the Company,
exclusive of carpenters, joiners, supervisors, and clerical employees.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
On September 1, 1937, the Company entered into a written closed-
shop agreement with Local No. 1561 as the representative of all
production employees of the Company, except upholsterers. The
agreement is effective until August 31, 1938, and contains a proviso
that negotiations for renewal are to be made 60 clays prior to the ter-
mination of the agreement.
On October 9, 1937, the Company and Local No. 15, representing
the upholsterers employed by the Company, entered into a written
contract to be in effect until August 1, 1938, and annually thereafter
unless notice is given to the contrary by either party on or before
July 1, of any year.'
The members of Local No. 15, at a special meeting held on January
25, 1938, voted, by secret ballot, to change their affiliation to the
C. I. O. and in like manner, the members of Local No. 1561, at a
regular meeting held on February 9, 1938, voted to change their affilia-
tion to the C. I. O. Thereafter the business agent of Local No. 1561
became the business agent of the C. I. O. and as such represented the
employees and adjusted grievances with the Company. The C. I. O.
claims that by virtue of the change of affiliation, it represents a large
majority of the production employees of the Company and, as the
new representative of the employees, it ii the successor in interest to
Local No. 15 and Local No. 1561. Local No. 15 and Local No. 1561
do not claim to represent a majority of the employees of the Com-
pany but contend that they have sufficient membership in the Los
i Since the contracts are about to expire and the negotiatoiy period for a new contract
begins on July 1, 1938, the rights under those contracts present no probicni in our cOnsid-
eiation of the issues in this case
DECISIONS AND OI11EIiS 1177
Angeles area to comply with the terms of the contract. They de-
mand that the contracts be enforced.
We find that a question has arisen concerning representation of tho
employees of the Company.
IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
UPON COMMERCE
We find that the question concerning representation which has
arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company
described in Section I above, has a close, intimate , and substantial
relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States, and
tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce
and the free flow of commerce.
V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT
At the hearing the C. I. 0., Local 1561, the District Council, and the
Brotherhood agreed that the production employees of the Company,
excluding clerical and supervisory employees , constitute a unit ap-
propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining. Local No. 15
raised no objection to such designation. Although Local No. 15 and
Local No. 161 have heretofore bargained on the basis of two separate
units, namely, the upholsterers and the carpenters, respectively, w o
find no reason to disregard the unit proposed without objection at
the hearing.
We find that the production employees of the Company, excluding
clerical and supervisory employees, constitute a unit appropriate for
the purposes of collective bargaining and that said unit will insure
to employees of the Company the full benefit of their right to self-
organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise effectuate
the policies of the Act.
Vr. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
The parties stipulated at the hearing that the pay roll of May 16,
1938, should be used as a basis for certification of election. There
were 77 production employees within the appropriate unit as of that
date. The C. I. O. introduced into evidence cards signed by em-
ployees of the Company within the appropriate unit, authorizing the
C. I. O'. to represent them. A check of these cards against the pay
roll of May 16, 1938, shows that 65 employees within the appropriate
unit have authorized the C. I. O. to represent them as their bargain-
ing agent. It is clear, therefore, that a majority of the employees of
the Company within the appropriate unit desire the C. I. O. to
represent them for such purposes.
1178 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
We find that the C. I. O. has been designated and selected by a
majority of the employees in the appropriate unit as their represent.
ative for the purposes of collective bargaining . It is, therefore, the
exclusive representative of all the employees in such unit for the
purposes of collective bargaining , and we will so certify.
TJpon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire
record in the case, the Board makes the following :
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre-
sentation of employees of Brown-Saltman Furniture Company, Los
Angeles, California , within the meaning of Section 9 ( c) and Section
2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act.
2. The production employees of the Company, excluding clerical
and supervisory employees, constitute a unit appropriate for the
purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section
9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act.
3. United Furniture Workers of America, Local No. 576, C. I. O.
is the exclusive representative of all the employees in such unit for
the purposes of collective bargaining , within the meaning of Section
9 (a) of the National Labor Relations Act.
CERTIFICATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National
Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor
Relations Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National
Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 1, as amended,
IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that United Furniture Workers of America,
Local No. 576, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organ-
ization, has been designated and selected by a 'majority of the pro-
duction employees Of Brown-Saltman Furniture Company, South-
gate, California, excluding clerical and supervisory employees, as
their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining and
that, pursuant to the provisions of Section 9 (a) of the Act, United
Furniture Workers of America, Local No. 576, affiliated with the
Committee for Industrial Organization, is the exclusive representa-
tive of all such employees for the purposes of collective bargaining
in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, and other
conditions of employment.
CHAIRMAN MADDEN took no part in the consideration of the above
Decision and Certification of Representatives.