Brian L. Rochester, Complainant,v.Lawrence J. Delaney, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 15, 2001
01A11582_r (E.E.O.C. May. 15, 2001)

01A11582_r

05-15-2001

Brian L. Rochester, Complainant, v. Lawrence J. Delaney, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Brian L. Rochester v. Department of the Air Force

01A11582

May 15, 2001

.

Brian L. Rochester,

Complainant,

v.

Lawrence J. Delaney,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A11582

Agency No. KFOJ00019

DECISION

On December 28, 2000, complainant filed a timely appeal with this

Commission from an agency decision pertaining to his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The

Commission accepts the appeal in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

Complainant contacted the EEO office regarding claims of discrimination

based on race and reprisal. Specifically, complainant claimed that he

was discriminated against when:

(a) on August 25, 28 and 30, 2000, he was told that he was not allowed

to wear a T-shirt in his organization with the logo NAAWP [National

Association for the Advancement of White People] on it and his AF Form

971 was documented to reflect this.

(b) on September 30, 2000, his supervisor attempted to use a

peer pressure tactic to get him to back away from his EEO complaint

(complainant was requested to attend a meeting where an agency official

asked if the problem would be solved by the imposition of a blanket

uniform policy that would punish everyone in the organization).

Informal efforts to resolve complainant's concerns were unsuccessful.

Subsequently, on November 22, 2000, complainant filed a formal complaint.

The agency issued a decision dismissing the complaint for failure

to state a claim. According to the agency, the actions taken by the

agency did not cause complainant to suffer a personal loss or harm with

respect to a term, condition or privilege of his employment. Moreover,

the agency reasoned that the remark made was unaccompanied by an agency

action and therefore did not render complainant an �aggrieved� employee.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,

.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined

an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which

there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

With respect to claim (a), complainant contends he was discriminated

against when he was told he could not wear a NAAWP T-shirt and when

the incident was documented in his 971 personnel file. We find that

complainant has stated a claim, in that the alleged incident concerns a

disciplinary action that is maintained in a system of records. See Hobson

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05891133 (March 2, 1990)(an

employee is �aggrieved� if he has suffered direct and personal deprivation

at the hands of the employer). Therefore, the dismissal of claim (a)

was improper.

In claim (b), complainant's supervisor purportedly attempted to use

peer pressure to get complainant to back away from his EEO complaint.

We agree with the agency, that complainant has failed to show how

the alleged event resulted in a harm or loss to a term, condition,

or privilege of his employment.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss claim (b) was proper

and is hereby AFFIRMED. The agency's decision to dismiss claim (a)

was improper and is REVERSED. Claim (a) is REMANDED to the agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 15, 2001

__________________

Date