Barry A. Ormond, Complainant,v.Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 30, 2008
0520080307 (E.E.O.C. May. 30, 2008)

0520080307

05-30-2008

Barry A. Ormond, Complainant, v. Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.


Barry A. Ormond,

Complainant,

v.

Michael B. Mukasey,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

Agency.

Request No. 0520080307

Appeal No. 0120062964

Hearing No. 120-2004-00343X

Agency No. P20030266

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Barry

A. Ormond v. Department of Justice (Federal Prisons), EEOC Appeal

No. 0120062964 (February 11, 2008). EEOC Regulations provide that the

Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any

previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that:

(1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a

substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the

agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

In his underlying complaint, complainant alleged that the agency subjected

him to unlawful discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq., on the bases of his race (African-American), age, and in

reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when: (1) he was subjected to

harassment and threats of workplace violence; and (2) his supervisor

initially denied him thirty minutes of compensatory time for June 4,

2003. The Administrative Judge (AJ) assigned to the case found that,

after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to complainant,

a decision without a hearing was appropriate as there were no genuine

issues of material fact in dispute. The AJ concluded that complainant

failed to show that he was subjected to discrimination as alleged, and

the agency's final order adopted the AJ's finding of no discrimination.

On appeal, the Commission affirmed the agency's final order.

In his request for reconsideration, complainant contends that the

Commission should reconsider his case based upon new evidence that

was not available at the time that complainant submitted his appeal.

We find, however, that after reconsidering the previous decision and

the entire record, including this new evidence, the request fails to

meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision

of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 0120062964 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no

further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission

on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action")).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 30, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0520080307

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

2

0520080307