Barbara J. Cheeksv.United States Postal Service 01A05744 April 20, 2001 . Barbara J. Cheeks, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 20, 2001
01A05744_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 20, 2001)

01A05744_r

04-20-2001

Barbara J. Cheeks v. United States Postal Service 01A05744 April 20, 2001 . Barbara J. Cheeks, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Barbara J. Cheeks v. United States Postal Service

01A05744

April 20, 2001

.

Barbara J. Cheeks,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A05744

Agency No. 4D-230-0173-00

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision not to

reinstate complainant's EEO matter that the parties had settled is

improper. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504. The record indicates that on April

5, 2000, complainant filed an informal complaint concerning a notice of

removal. Thereafter, on June 19, 2000, the parties resolved the matter by

entering into a settlement agreement, which provided, in pertinent part,

that: management reduced the current removal to a 30-day suspension-time

served pending the first week of June 2000; the parties will enter into a

Last Chance Agreement within the next 10 calendar days; the Last Chance

Agreement will be in effect for one year from the date signed; and the

removal of the 30-day letter of suspension will remain in the file for the

period of the Last Chance Agreement and will be purged. By letter dated

July 17, 2000, complainant alleged breach of the settlement agreement

in that she could not sign the Last Chance Agreement which was offered

to her on June 29, 2000, because �the wording was different from that

of� the settlement agreement. In its decision, the agency stated that

since the settlement agreement did not state the specific language of

the Last Chance Agreement, it did not breach the settlement agreement.

After a review of the record, the Commission finds that the settlement

agreement specifically provided that the parties will enter into the

Last Chance Agreement. Since the parties were not able to enter into

the Last Chance Agreement, the Commission finds the settlement agreement

void due to its impossibility. See Shuman v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05900744 (July 20, 1990). The Commission notes that

complainant's notice of removal was already reduced to a 30-day suspension

prior to the settlement agreement.

Accordingly, the agency's decision finding no settlement breach is VACATED

and the purportedly settled matter is REMANDED back to the agency for

further processing in accordance with this decision and applicable

regulations.

ORDER

The agency, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision

becomes final, is ORDERED to resume the processing of complainant's

EEO matter from the point processing ceased in accordance with Part

1614 regulations. The agency, within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final, shall notify the complainant that it

has resumed processing her underlying EEO matter.

A copy of the agency's letter of processing to complainant must be sent

to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 20, 2001

__________________

Date