0120160406
08-16-2017
Aron J.,1 Complainant, v. Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary, Department of Commerce (Patent and Trademark Office), Agency.
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Aron J.,1
Complainant,
v.
Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.,
Secretary,
Department of Commerce
(Patent and Trademark Office),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120160406
Hearing No. 570201300395X
Agency No. 125655
DECISION
Complainant timely appealed, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403 the Agency's October 30, 2015 final order concerning his equal employment opportunity ("EEO") complaint alleging employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 ("ADEA"), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.2
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was a prior Agency employee and an applicant for positions within the Agency's Detroit, Michigan Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") and other PTO satellite offices.3
On March 15, 2013, Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency had discriminated against him on the bases of race (Slavic), national origin (United States), religion (Catholic), and age (62) when:
1. On August 4, 2012, he was notified that he was not selected for the position of Patent Examiner (Electrical Engineer) GS-11, Vacancy Announcement Number CP-2012-0114.
2. On February 12, 2013, he was notified that he was not selected for the position of Patent Examiner (Electrical Engineer) GS-11, Vacancy Announcement Number CP-2013-0002.
After its investigation into the complaint, the Agency provided Complainant with a copy of the report of investigation and notice of right to request a hearing before an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC" or "Commission") Administrative Judge ("AJ"). Complainant timely requested a hearing. The Agency submitted a motion for a decision without a hearing. The AJ subsequently issued a decision by summary judgment in favor of the Agency.
The Agency issued its final order adopting the AJ's finding that Complainant failed to prove discrimination as alleged. The instant appeal followed.
The Commission's regulations allow an AJ to grant summary judgment when he or she finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.109(g). An issue of fact is "genuine" if the evidence is such that a reasonable fact finder could find in favor of the non-moving party. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986); Oliver v. Digital Equip. Corp., 846 F.2d 103, 105 (1st Cir. 1988). A fact is "material" if it has the potential to affect the outcome of the case. In rendering this appellate decision we must scrutinize the AJ's legal and factual conclusions, and the Agency's final order adopting them, de novo. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a)(stating that a "decision on an appeal from an Agency's final action shall be based on a de novo review..."); see also Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO-MD-110), at Chap. 9, � VI.B. (as revised, August 5, 2015)(providing that an administrative judge's determination to issue a decision without a hearing, and the decision itself, will both be reviewed de novo).
In order to successfully oppose a decision by summary judgment, a complainant must identify, with specificity, facts in dispute either within the record or by producing further supporting evidence, and must further establish that such facts are material under applicable law. Such a dispute would indicate that a hearing is necessary to produce evidence to support a finding that the agency was motivated by discriminatory animus. Here, however, Complainant has failed to establish such a dispute. Even construing any inferences raised by the undisputed facts in favor of Complainant, a reasonable fact-finder could not find in Complainant's favor.
Upon careful review of the AJ's decision and the evidence of record, as well as the parties' arguments on appeal, we conclude that the AJ correctly determined that the preponderance of the evidence did not establish that Complainant was discriminated against by the Agency as alleged.
Specifically, we find Complainant's appellate argument is simply an attempt to resurrect the EEO Complaint he filed upon his termination from his previous position with the Agency. The matter was thoroughly reviewed by both an AJ and this Commission. See EEOC Hearing No. 570-2009-00712X (Aug. 26, 2010) and EEOC Appeal No. (0120121928) (May 15, 2014) reconsideration denied EEOC Request No. 0520140385 (Dec. 5, 2014). Complainant had ample opportunity to present his case that the Agency's proffered legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for the termination (performance issues) was pretext for a discriminatory motive and he was unable to do so. As we explained in our denial of Complainant's request for reconsideration, Complainant has no further right of administrative appeal with regard to his January 30, 2009 termination. See Request No. 0520140385, supra. This means Complainant cannot raise the matter with this Commission, even if he believes he is presenting "new" or previously unexamined evidence, or as an argument that he was discriminated against in another complaint, as he is making the same allegations about the same alleged responsible management official in a matter we previously decided. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1); see also Doleshal v. Dep't of Health & Human Servs., EEOC Appeal No. 01A40020 (July 29, 2004). Complainant's appeal does not offer any pertinent arguments with regard to the complaint before us.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the Agency's final order adopting the AJ's decision.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0617)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Complainant's request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The agency's request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC's Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
August 16, 2017
__________________
Date
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.
2 The instant complaint was initially raised as Agency Nos. 125655 and 135621 but was consolidated on February 11, 2014 by order of the AJ.
3 Complainant previously worked as a Patent Examiner (Electrical Engineer) GS-11 in the Agency's Alexandria, Virginia PTO from 2007 to 2009, but his employment was terminated during his probationary period for poor performance. Complainant filed an EEO complaint discussed infra. See EEOC Appeal No. 0120121928 (May 15, 2014).
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0120160406
4
0120160406
5 0120160406