0120120624
10-25-2012
Arlene M. Sperl, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.
Arlene M. Sperl,
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Western Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120120624
Agency No. 4E553002511
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated October 31, 2011, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Maintenance Support Clerk at the Agency's Mankato P&DF facility in Mankato, Minnesota.
On August 23, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of age (65) and reprisal for from March 28, 2011 and continuing, she has been denied overtime.
The Agency accepted the complaint and commenced an investigation. On September 20, 2011, the investigator sent Complainant a request for an affidavit along with instructions and forms for completing the affidavit. In its October 31, 2011 final decision, the Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7), for failure to cooperate, asserting that Complainant failed to return the requested affidavit despite a written warning in the affidavit packet sent to her that failure to provide the affidavit could result in the dismissal of his complaint.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7) provides for the dismissal of a complaint where the agency has provided the complainant with a written request to provide relevant information or otherwise proceed with the complaint, and the complainant has failed to respond to the request within fifteen days of its receipt, or the complainant's response does not address the agency's request, provided that the request included a notice of the proposed dismissal. The regulation further provides that, instead of dismissing for failure to cooperate, the complaint may be adjudicated if sufficient information for that purpose is available. Generally, the Commission has held that an agency should not dismiss a complaint when it has sufficient information upon which to base an adjudication. See Ross v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05900693 (August 17, 1990); Brinson v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05900193 (April 12, 1990). It is only in cases where the complainant has engaged in delay or contumacious conduct and the record is insufficient to permit adjudication that the Commission as allowed a complaint to be dismissed for failure to cooperate. See Card v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05970095 (April 23, 1998); Kroeten v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940451 (Dec. 22, 1994).
In her appeal, Complainant includes a copy of a November 3, 2011 letter to the EEO Investigative Services, insisting that she did send the affidavit to the Agency in a timely manner. Complainant explains she received the packet on September 23, 2011 and returned the paperwork to the Agency's Investigative s office where it should have been received by October 7, 2011. Complainant indicated she would resend the information and the record contains a copy of the completed affidavit which carries an October 3, 2011 date and compromises approximately 25 pages. The post mark on the envelope was November 11, 2011, and it was sent to the Agency's offices (NEEOISO) in Florida.
In the instant case, the evidence of record does not support a finding the Complainant purposely engaged in delay or contumacious conduct. Complainant convincingly asserts that she mailed in the requested affidavit in a timely manner by first class mail, and does not know why it was not received. We note that there was no requirement or notice to Complainant that she should return the affidavit by certified mail to ensure proof of mailing. Further complicating matters is that the affidavit was to be mailed to a contract investigator, not to the Agency's EEO office. While the Agency asserts in its dismissal decision that the affidavit was not received, the record does not contain a sworn statement from an agency official attesting to this fact. In Ericson v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920623 (January 14, 1993), the Commission stated that "the agency has the burden of providing evidence and/or proof to support its final decisions." See also Gens v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992).
Accordingly, we conclude that the Agency's dismissal of this complaint should be reversed and the complaint is remanded to the Agency to continue the investigation in accordance with the following Order.
ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)
This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 25, 2012
__________________
Date
2
0120120624
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120120624