Anthony C. Harris, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 25, 2012
0120121311 (E.E.O.C. May. 25, 2012)

0120121311

05-25-2012

Anthony C. Harris, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.


Anthony C. Harris,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Western Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120121311

Agency No. 4E500007411

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated December 7, 2011, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Postmaster at the Agency's Post Office in Davenport, Iowa.

On November 19, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American) and sex (male) when on July 31, 2011 and continuing, management violated a prior verbal agreement when it failed to provide work for his wife ("trailing spouse") within the district. Complainant alleged that when he agreed to accept a position within the district from another area, he was promised that his wife would also be provided with work in the district. However, after several details, she was told there was no more work and was forced to return to her former position in the Houston Post Office. We note that Complainant's spouse has also filed an EEO complaint on this matter.1

In its December 2011 final decision, the Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely filing of the formal complaint. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106(b) which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so.

The record discloses that the notice of right to file a formal complaint was signed for at Complainant's address of record on November 2, 2011. Fifteen calendar days from that date would have been Thursday, November 15, 2011. However, while the notice of right to file indicated that Complainant had to file a formal complaint within 15 calendar days of its receipt, the evidence of record indicates that Complainant did not file his formal complaint until Saturday, November 19, 2011, which is beyond the limitation period. The record contains the envelope in which the formal complaint was sent which is clearly postmarked on November 19, 2011. On appeal, Complainant has not offered adequate justification to warrant an extension of the time limit for filing the complaint.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 25, 2012

__________________

Date

1 In Harris v. USPS, Appeal No. 0120120374 (March 23, 2012), the Commission reversed the Agency's dismissal for failure to state a claim and remanded the matter for further processing.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120121311

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120121311