Ana Torres, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 24, 2004
01A45513 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 24, 2004)

01A45513

11-24-2004

Ana Torres, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Ana Torres v. United States Postal Service

01A45513

November 24, 2004

.

Ana Torres,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A45513

Agency No. 4A-006-0025-04

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to

state a claim. In a complaint dated June 18, 2004, complainant alleged

that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of sex (female),

disability, and reprisal for prior EEO activity when she was subjected

to a hostile work environment. In documents provided in the record,

complainant asserts the following event occurred between January 2003

and January 2004:

Her supervisor (S) made sexual overtures towards her;

The S made unsolicited sexual comments, checked her out, and touched

her without permission;

In late January 2004, the S was breathing heavily while standing behind

complainant and winked at her while slumped in an �unorthodox position;�

The S inconsistently applied leave policies to complainant and asked

her personal questions when she requested leave;

The S denied her leave to see an allergist;

The S screamed and yelled at complainant;

The S accused complainant of not doing work for which she was not

responsible;

The S used complainant as a scapegoat;

The S threw a chair from complainant's office down the hallway and,

on another occasion, broke complainant's personal item;

The S violated complainant's medical restrictions by exposing her to

fumes in the work place such as by the copy machine;

The S threatened complainant with poor evaluations;

In January 2004, the S stared at complainant's breasts; and

In January 2004, the S told complainant to remove artifacts from her

work place while others were permitted to keep similar items in their

work places.

The FAD did not dismiss the complaint under any particular regulation.

However, it did find that the incidents alleged were not sufficiently

severe or pervasive enough to alter a term, condition, or privilege of

her employment. Therefore, we presume that the agency's dismissal of

the complaint at hand was for failure to state a claim. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1).

A complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless

it appears beyond doubt that the complainant cannot prove a set of facts

in support of the claim which would entitle the complainant to relief.

The trier of fact must consider all of the alleged harassing incidents

and remarks, and considering them together in the light most favorable to

the complainant, determine whether they are sufficient to state a claim.

Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March

13, 1997).

In the present case, complainant alleges that she was subjected to

harassment by principally the S. The alleged harassment occurred from

January 2003 through January 2004, consisting of denial of leave, verbal

and physical attacks, and sexual remarks, which purportedly created a

hostile work environment. Considering that the alleged identified actions

were all perpetrated by the S, that they occurred over a relatively short

period of time, and viewing the identified remarks and actions in the

light most favorable to complainant, we find that complainant has stated

a cognizable claim under the EEOC Regulations. See Cervantes v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930303 (November 12, 1993).

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint

for failure to state a claim was improper and the FAD is reversed and

the complaint remanded for further processing in accordance with the

proper regulations and the order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 24, 2004

__________________

Date