Amy G. Dugan, Complainant,v.Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 25, 2006
01a51446 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 25, 2006)

01a51446

04-25-2006

Amy G. Dugan, Complainant, v. Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Amy G. Dugan v. Department of the Air Force

01A51446

April 25, 2006

.

Amy G. Dugan,

Complainant,

v.

Michael W. Wynne,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A51446

Agency No. 6M0M04013

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated November 2, 2004, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

On August 11, 2004, complainant filed a formal complaint, claiming that

she was the victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the bases

of sex, age, and in reprisal for prior protected activity.

In its November 2, 2004 final decision, the agency dismissed complainant's

complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state

a claim. Specifically, the agency determined that a request for

clarification was mailed to complainant on October 6, 2004, informing

her that failure to respond within fifteen days of receipt could result

in the dismissal of her complaint, but that a response was never sent

to the agency.

In response to complainant' appeal, the agency states that in

complainant's complaint form, which requests that complainants to

provide a specific explanation of alleged discriminatory events,

complainant listed a �short paragraph in terse bullet form, and attached

five continuation pages.� The agency argues that the continuation

pages are written in fragments, and that it is impossible to tell what

is claimed. The agency notes that complainant apparently claims that

some matters arose in her military capacity, over which the Commission

has no jurisdiction, and that others simply address workplace problems,

and not express discrimination claims.

Upon review, the Commission agrees with the agency and determines that

because of the vague and general nature of the matters raised in the

instant complaint, the complaint failed to state a claim under the EEOC

regulations because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm or

loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for

which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). The Commission notes, moreover,

that the agency's attempts to secure clarification from complainant

on the express claims of which her formal complaint was comprised,

were unsuccessful.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 25, 2006

__________________

Date