0120162389
10-14-2016
Alfredo S.,1 Complainant, v. Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Alfredo S.,1
Complainant,
v.
Robert McDonald,
Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120162389
Agency No. 200J05062016101814
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated June 24, 2016, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Program Support Assistant at the Agency's Ann Arbor VA Health Care System facility in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
On May 9, 2016, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of disability when: (1) during August 2015, the Administrative Officer questioned Complainant's disability when he traveled to Italy, and asked, "how can you sit on a place for 8 hours"; (2) on October 15, 2015, he was charged with being absent without official leave (AWOL); (3) on November 2, 2015, he was issued an admonishment; (4) on December 26, 2015, a co-worker advised him that the Administrative Officer was telling staff, "sorry you have to do extra work, [Complainant] is out again"; (5) on January 7, 2016, the Administrative Officer asked him, via email, what condition he was using when he requested FMLA; and (6) on February 17, 2016, the Administrative Officer denied his request for leave without pay.
The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to the untimely filing of the formal complaint. The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106, which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so.
The record discloses that Complainant received the notice of right to file a formal complaint on April 18, 2016. Although the notice indicated that Complainant had to file a formal complaint within fifteen (15) calendar days of its receipt, Complainant did not file his formal complaint until May 9, 2016, which is beyond the limitation period.
On appeal, Complainant argues that his delay in filing his complaint should be excused because he faxed his formal complaint to a wrong fax number on April 29, 2016. He also states that he mailed a copy of his complaint to the Agency's Office of General Counsel on the same date.
The Commission has previously held that when provided with the proper address, filing at the wrong address does not constitute a proper filing. See Pacheco v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930700 (September 10, 1993) (appeal untimely when sent to wrong address despite receipt of proper instructions); Meggitt v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A40408 (February 3, 2004) (above principle applied to a formal complaint that was untimely filed). Here, an examination of the notice of right to file shows that Complainant was provided with correct addresses and fax numbers for filing. However, by his own admission, Complainant did not send his complaint to these addresses or fax numbers. As to Complainant's assertion that he sent a copy of his formal complaint to the Agency's Office of General Counsel, we note that office is not listed on the notice of right to file. Complainant does not explain why he did not send it to one of the two addresses listed on the notice. Complainant has failed to provide an adequate reason to extend the filing period.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0416)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The requests may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
October 14, 2016
__________________
Date
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0120162389
2
0120162389