Alan Ritchey, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Apr 27, 2010

32-CA-018149 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 27, 2010)

Richmond, CA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ALAN RITCHEY, INC.
Cases 32-CA-1 8149
and 32-CA-i18459
32-CA-i18526
WAREHOUSE UNION LOCAL 6, 32-CA-i18601
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND 32-CA-18693
WAREHOUSE UNION, AFL-CIO
CORRECTED SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
On September 25, 2009, the Board issued a Decision and Order (354 NLRB No. 79), in
which the issue of whether the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by
enforcing a changed efficiency policy for its inspectors after the April 13, 2000 election, was
remanded to Administrative Law Judge Burton Litvack for the issuance of a supplemental
decision limited to that issue, setting forth findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a
recommended Order.
On February 4, 2010, Administrative Law Judge Burton Litvack of the National Labor
Relations Board issued his Supplemental Decision in the above-entitled proceeding and, on the
same date, the proceeding was transferred to and continued before the Board in Washington,
D.C. The Administrative Law Judge found that the Respondent has not engaged in certain
unfair labor practices, and recommended that the unfair labor practice allegation, that
Respondent violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act by unilaterally changing its efficiency
policy after the April 13, 2000 election by more stringently enforcing its efficiency standard for
inspectors be dismissed.
No statement of exceptions having been filed with the Board, and the time allowed for
such filing having expired,
Pursuant to Section 1 0(c) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, and Section
102.48 of the National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations, the Board adopts the
findings, and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge as contained in his Supplemental
Decision, and the recommended Order of the Administrative Law Judge becomes the Order of
the Board. Accordingly, the issue of whether the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of
the Act by enforcing a changed efficiency policy for its inspectors after the April 13, 2000
election is dismissed.'
Dated, Washington, D.C., April 27, 2010.
By direction of the Board: Richard D. Hardick
Associate Executive Secretary
On March 16, 2010, the National Labor Relations Board, having received no statement of
exceptions to Administrative Law Judge's Decision of February 4, 2010, issued a Supplemental
Order in the a above entitled proceeding, adoptinig the findings, conclusions and
recommendations of the Administrative Law Judge. That Supplemental Order contained errors
in the last paragraph, which are corrected by this Corrected Supplemental Order. Also, this
Corrected Supplemental Order contains a new first paragraph.
2