_____________, Complainant,v.Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary, Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 8, 2012
0120112894 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 8, 2012)

0120112894

02-08-2012

_____________, Complainant, v. Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary, Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service), Agency.




_____________,

Complainant,

v.

Timothy F. Geithner,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury

(Internal Revenue Service),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112894

Agency No. IRS-11-0244-F

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

Agency’s decision dated May 12, 2011, dismissing her complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant

worked as a Revenue Officer at the Agency’s facility in Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania. On February 22, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint

alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases

of her sex (female) and in reprisal for prior protected EEO when:

1. on unspecified dates her supervisor refused her requests to correct

two Notices of Liens;

2. after her September 18, 2008 resignation from her position, management

did not provide her with her requested departure rating;

3. management did not provide a copy of her official personnel file (OPF)

until August 2010, and did not later add her letter of resignation to

the OPF as requested;

4. management sent information to the wrong unemployment compensation

office at some time because she received the OPF in August 2010; and

5. management failed to provide Complainant with a copy of the Request

for Personnel Action Standard Form 52 with its Privacy Act Statement

for her to complete.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §

1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim. Specifically, the Agency

found that Complainant failed to show she was aggrieved. The Agency also

dismissed the instant complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1614.107(a)(2),

for untimely EEO Counselor contact. On appeal, Complainant reiterates her

contention that the Agency has subjected her to unlawful discrimination.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103,

.106(a). The Commission’s federal sector case precedent has long

defined an “aggrieved employee” as one who suffers a present harm

of loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC

Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

We note that the Agency attempted to obtain clarification of the

exact nature of the complaint after the filing of the complaint.

The Commission finds that the Agency properly defined the complaint.

The Commission agrees with the Agency that Complainant has failed to

show how she was specifically aggrieved concerning her employment by

the incidents in the complaint, many or all of which appear to have

arisen after Complainant’s employment with the Agency.1 Furthermore,

none of the incidents rise to the level of severity or pervasiveness so

as to state a claim of harassment.2

CONCLUSION

The Agency’s decision dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 8, 2012

__________________

Date

1 The Agency states that it issued a decision in June 2009, finding

no discrimination concerning Complainant’s claim that she was

constructively discharged.

2 Because we have determined that the complaint was properly dismissed for

failure to state a claim, we need not address the Agency’s alternative

grounds for dismissing the complaint.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120112894

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120112894