Section R612-300-11 - Utilization Review StandardsA. Purpose of Utilization Review and Definitions. 1. "Utilization Review" is used to manage medical costs, improve patient care and enhance decision-making. Utilization review includes, but is not limited to, the review of requests for authorization and the review of medical bills to determine whether the medical services were or are necessary to treat a workplace injury. Utilization review does not include: a. bill review for the purpose of determining whether the medical services rendered were accurately billed, orb. any system, program, or activity used to determine whether an individual has sustained a workplace injury.2. Any utilization review system shall incorporate a two-level review process that meets the criteria set forth in subsections B and C of this rule.3. Definitions. As used in this rule: a. "Request for Authorization" means any request by a physician for assurance that appropriate payment will be made for a course of proposed medical treatment.b. "Reasonable Attempt" requires at least two phone calls and a fax, two phone calls and an e-mail, or three phone calls, within five business days from date of the payor's receipt of the physician's request for review.B. Level I - Initial Request and Review. 1. A health care provider may use Form 223 to request authorization and payment for proposed medical treatment. The provider shall attach all documentation necessary for the payor to make a decision regarding the proposed treatment.a. Requests for approval of restorative services are governed by the provisions of Section R612-300.5. C. 7. which requires submission of the appropriate RSA form and documentation.2. Upon receipt of the provider's request for authorization, the payor may use medical or non-medical personnel to apply medically-based criteria to determine whether to approve the request. The payor must:a. Within 5 business days after receiving the request and documentation, transmit Form 223 back to the physician, in a verifiable manner, advising of the payor's approval or denial of the proposed treatment. i. If approval is denied, the payor must include with its denial a statement of the criteria it used to make its determination. A copy of the denial must also be mailed to the injured worker.C. Level II - Review. 1. A health care provider who has been denied authorization or has received no timely response may request a physician's review by completing and sending the applicable portion of Commission Form 223 to the payor.a. The provider must include the times and days that he/she is available to discuss the case with the reviewing physician, and must be reasonably available during normal business hours.b. This request for review may be used by a health care provider who has been denied authorization for restorative services pursuant to Subsection R612-300-5.C.7.2. The payor's physician representative must complete the review within five business days of the treating physician's request for review. Additional time may be requested from the Commission to accommodate highly unusual circumstances or particularly difficult cases.a. The insurer's physician representative must make a reasonable effort to contact the requesting provider to discuss the request for treatment. The payor shall notify the Commission if an additional five days is needed in order to contact the treating physician or to review the case.b. If the payor again denies approval of the recommended treatment, the payor must complete the appropriate portion of Commission Form 223, and shall include: i. the criteria used by the payor in making the decision to deny authorization; andii. the name and specialty of the payor's reviewing physician;iii. appeals information.c. The denial to authorize payment for treatment must then be sent to the physician, the injured worker and the Commission.3. The payor's failure to respond to the review request within five business days, by a method which provides certification of transmission, shall constitute authorization for payment of the treatment.D. Mediation and Adjudication. Upon receipt of denial of authorization for payment for medical treatment at Level II, the Commission will facilitate, upon the request of the injured worker, the final disposition of the case. 1. If the parties agree, the medical dispute will be referred to Commission staff for mediation.2. If the parties do not agree to mediation, the matter will be referred to the Division of Adjudication for hearing and decision.E. Reduction of Fee for Failure to Follow Utilization Review Standards. 1. In cases in which a health care provider has received notice of this rule but proceeds with non-emergency medical treatment without obtaining payor authorization, the following shall apply: a. If the medical treatment is ultimately determined to be necessary to treat a workplace injury, the fee otherwise due the health care provider shall be reduced by 25%.b. If the medical treatment is ultimately determined to be unnecessary to treat a workplace injury, the payor is not liable for payment for such treatment. The injured worker may be liable for the cost of treatment.2. The penalty provision in D. 1. shall not apply if the medical treatment in question has been preauthorized by some other non-worker's compensation insurance company or other payor.Utah Admin. Code R612-300-11
Amended by Utah State Bulletin Number 2014-22, effective 10/22/2014Amended by Utah State Bulletin Number 2019-2, effective 1/1/2019Amended by Utah State Bulletin Number 2020-02, effective 12/23/2019