Section 16437 - Determination of Amount of Forfeiture by the Labor Commissioner(a) Where the Labor Compliance Program requests a determination of the amount of forfeiture, the request shall include a file or report to the Labor Commissioner which contains at least the information specified in subparts (1) through (9) below. Appendix D is a suggested format for a Request for Approval of Forfeiture under this section. (1) Whether the public work has been accepted by the awarding body and whether a valid notice of completion has been filed, the dates if any when those events occurred, and the amount of funds being held in retention by the Awarding Body;(2) Any other deadline which if missed would impede collection;(3) Evidence of violation, in narrative form;(4) Evidence of violation obtained under section 16432 of these regulations and a copy of the Audit prepared in accordance with section 16432(e) setting forth the amounts of unpaid wages and applicable penalties;(5) Evidence that before the forfeiture was sent to the Labor Commissioner (A) the contractor and subcontractor were given the opportunity to explain why there was no violation, or that any violation was caused by good faith mistake and promptly corrected when brought to the contractor or subcontractor's attention, and (B) the contractor and subcontractor either did not do so or failed to convince the Labor Compliance Program of its position;(6) Where the Labor Compliance Program seeks not only wages but also a penalty as part of the forfeiture, and the contractor or subcontractor has unsuccessfully contended that the cause of violation was a good faith mistake that was promptly corrected when brought to the contractor or subcontractor's attention, a short statement should accompany the proposal for a forfeiture, with a recommended penalty amount pursuant to Labor Code Section 1775(a);(7) Where the Labor Compliance Program seeks only wages or a penalty less than $50 per day as part of the forfeiture because the contractor or subcontractor has successfully contended that the cause of the violation was a good faith mistake that was promptly corrected when brought to the contractor or subcontractor's attention, the file should include the evidence as to the contractor or subcontractor's knowledge of his or her obligation, including the program's communication to the contractor or subcontractor of the obligation in the bid invitations, at the prejob conference agenda and records, and any other notice given as part of the contracting process. With the file should be a statement, similar to that described in (6), and recommended penalty amounts, pursuant to Labor Code Section 1775(a);(8) The previous record of the contractor and subcontractor in meeting their prevailing wage obligations; and(9) Whether the Labor Compliance Program has been granted approval on only an interim or temporary basis under sections 16425 or 16426 above or whether it has been granted extended approval under section 16427 above.(b) The file or report shall be served on the Labor Commissioner as soon as practicable after the violation has been discovered, and not less than 30 days before the final payment, but in no event not less than 30 days before the expiration of the limitations period set forth in Labor Code Section 1741.(c) A copy of the recommended forfeiture and the file or report shall be served on the contractor and subcontractor at the same time as it is sent to the Labor Commissioner. The Labor Compliance Program may exclude from the documents served on the contractor and subcontractor copies of documents secured from the contractor or subcontractor during an audit, investigation, or meeting if those are clearly referenced in the file or report.(d) The Labor Commissioner shall affirm, reject, or modify the forfeiture in whole or in part as to the wages and penalties due.(e) The Labor Commissioner's determination of the forfeiture is effective on one of the two following dates:(1) For all programs other than those having extended authority under section 16427 of these regulations, on the date the Labor Commissioner serves by first class mail, on the Labor Compliance Program, on the Awarding Body if different, on the contractor and on the subcontractor, if any, an endorsed copy of the proposed forfeiture, or a newly drafted forfeiture statement which sets out the amount of forfeiture approved. Service on the contractor or subcontractor is effective if made on the last address supplied by the contractor or subcontractor in the record. The Labor Commissioner's approval, modification or disapproval of the proposed forfeiture shall be served within 30 days of receipt of the proposed forfeiture.(2) For programs with extended authority under section 16427 above, approval is effective 20 days after the requested forfeitures are served upon the Labor Commissioner, unless the Labor Commissioner serves a notice upon the parties, within that time period, that this forfeiture request is subject to further review. For such programs, a notice that approval will follow such a procedure will be included in the transmittal of the forfeiture request to the contractor. If the Labor Commissioner notifies the parties of a decision to undertake further review, the Labor Commissioner's final approval, modification or disapproval of the proposed forfeiture shall be served within 30 days of the date of notice of further review.Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 8, § 16437
1. New section and Appendix filed 2-20-92; operative 3-23-92 (Register 92, No. 13).
2. Amendment of section and repealer of Appendix C filed 10-19-2004; operative 11-18-2004 (Register 2004, No. 43).
3. Amendment of section and new Appendix D filed 12-22-2008; operative 1-21-2009 (Register 2008, No. 52). Note: Authority cited: Section 1773.5, Labor Code. Reference: Sections 1771.5 and 1775, Labor Code.
1. New section and Appendix filed 2-20-92; operative 3-23-92 (Register 92, No. 13).
2. Amendment of section and repealer of Appendix C filed 10-19-2004; operative 11-18-2004 (Register 2004, No. 43).
3. Amendment of section and new Appendix D filed 12-22-2008; operative 1-21-2009 (Register 2008, No. 52).