From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zweig et al. v. Hearst Corp.

U.S.
Dec 8, 1975
423 U.S. 1025 (1975)

Summary

holding that a confession is presumed to be given by a competent person so that "burden is on the defendant to show some evidence to the contrary"

Summary of this case from State v. Jason F

Opinion

No. 75-573.

December 8, 1975.


C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE STEWART and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would grant certiorari. Reported below: 521 F. 2d 1129.


Summaries of

Zweig et al. v. Hearst Corp.

U.S.
Dec 8, 1975
423 U.S. 1025 (1975)

holding that a confession is presumed to be given by a competent person so that "burden is on the defendant to show some evidence to the contrary"

Summary of this case from State v. Jason F

adopting a slightly modified version of the New York Times standard

Summary of this case from Foster v. Laredo Newspapers Inc.

affirming summary judgment for defendant publisher on issue of its good faith in securities fraud case

Summary of this case from Letson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Case details for

Zweig et al. v. Hearst Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ZWEIG ET AL. v. HEARST CORP

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 8, 1975

Citations

423 U.S. 1025 (1975)

Citing Cases

State v. Storlazzi

It is important to note that this case does not involve the question of whether or under what circumstances…

State v. Carey

The state has not questioned the validity of the Appellate Court's decision that, in a hearing for revocation…