Opinion
3:24-cv-753-WWB-SJH
11-22-2024
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, etc. Plaintiff, v. DISCOUNT WASTE, INC., etc., et al., Defendants.
ORDER
SAMUEL J. HOROVITZ, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company's Reply to Defendant Floaters Portable Sanitation, Inc.'s Affirmative Defenses, Doc. 18, and Reply to Defendant Discount Waste, Inc.'s Affirmative Defenses, Doc. 19 (collectively, “Replies”). Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a reply to an answer” is an allowed pleading, but only “if the court orders one.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a)(7). In the present case, the Court has not ordered Plaintiff to file a reply. Accordingly, it is ordered that the Replies (Docs. 18 & 19) are stricken.
DONE AND ORDERED.