From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zumbrunnen v. Turner

Supreme Court of Utah
May 18, 1972
497 P.2d 34 (Utah 1972)

Opinion

No. 12754.

May 18, 1972.

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Ernest F. Baldwin, Jr., J.

Salt Lake Legal Defender Assn., David P. Rhode, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., David S. Young, Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Larry V. Lunt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.


Appeal from a dismissal of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Affirmed.

The day before defendant's trial setting, and represented by counsel, he pleaded guilty to burglary upon dismissal of two similar charges. He pursued this petition, after his time for appeal from the conviction had expired. He claimed 1) his plea was involuntary and unintelligent, and that 2) his counsel, who assisted him at his request, was incompetent. Both points could have been urged on a regular appeal. This court repeatedly has said the writ cannot be used as a substitute for such appeal. Besides, it appears that neither point is well taken.

CALLISTER, C. J., and TUCKETT, ELLETT and CROCKETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Zumbrunnen v. Turner

Supreme Court of Utah
May 18, 1972
497 P.2d 34 (Utah 1972)
Case details for

Zumbrunnen v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:Milton Curtis ZUMBRUNNEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. John W. TURNER…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: May 18, 1972

Citations

497 P.2d 34 (Utah 1972)
27 Utah 2

Citing Cases

Webster v. Jones

The rule which we recognize is that the writ may be used in certain exigent circumstances, including where…

Rose v. Smith

This court has spoken in a number of different cases, involving the same situation, which are dispositive…