From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zulveta v. Barrett Law Firm

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 23, 2020
No. 20-1288 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-1288

11-23-2020

ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE BARRETT LAW FIRM, Dan Barrett; CLAWSON AND STAUBES, LLC; THE HARTFORD MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; LARMORE LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATES, INC.; CONSOLIDATED LANDSCAPING INC.; BROWN CRUMP VANORE & TIERNEY, L.L.P.; BRENT'S LAWN CARE, Defendants - Appellees, and TIMOTHY DOMIN; TURNER PADGET GRAHAM & LANEY, PA; ERIC K. ENGLEBARDT; GALLIVAN WHITE & BOYD, P.A.; HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A.; J. BEN ALEXANDER; KENNETH SHAW; THE HAYNSWORTH PERRY AMERICAN INNS OF COURT; WILSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY PA; WILSON SHELDON; HENRY M. HERLON, Judge; G. ANDERSON ROSS, Judge, Defendants.

Armando Despaigne Zulveta, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Daniel Barrett, BARRETT LAW FIRM, Clemmons, North Carolina; Ann Cox Rowe, DAVIS & HAMRICK, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; R. Scott Brown, William John Cathcart, Jr., BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Andrew Garrison Pinto, PINTO, COATES, KYRE & BOWERS, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00978-CCE-JLW) Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Armando Despaigne Zulveta, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Daniel Barrett, BARRETT LAW FIRM, Clemmons, North Carolina; Ann Cox Rowe, DAVIS & HAMRICK, LLP, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; R. Scott Brown, William John Cathcart, Jr., BROWN, CRUMP, VANORE & TIERNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina; Andrew Garrison Pinto, PINTO, COATES, KYRE & BOWERS, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Armando Despaigne Zulveta appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Zulveta's motion to expedite decision and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zulveta v. The Barrett Law Firm, No. 1:19-cv-00978-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. Mar. 2, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Zulveta v. Barrett Law Firm

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 23, 2020
No. 20-1288 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Zulveta v. Barrett Law Firm

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE BARRETT LAW FIRM…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 23, 2020

Citations

No. 20-1288 (4th Cir. Nov. 23, 2020)