From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zulinsky v. Greenblat

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
189 A. 51 (N.J. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted October 30, 1936 —

Decided January 22, 1937.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 14 N.J. Mis. R. 345.

For the respondents, Andrew O. Wittreich.

For the appellant, Collins Corbin.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, COLE, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Zulinsky v. Greenblat

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1937
189 A. 51 (N.J. 1937)
Case details for

Zulinsky v. Greenblat

Case Details

Full title:WALTER ZULINSKY, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. PETER…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1937

Citations

189 A. 51 (N.J. 1937)
189 A. 51

Citing Cases

Malila v. Meacham

But, where there is a difference of opinion among the experts as to the fact, the question should be…

Hull v. Plume

Nevertheless a nonsuit was sustained, the opinion stating that, "There was no professional or expert…