In Z.U. v. F.U, the Court found Plaintiff experienced extreme hardship and was permanently limited in his career and ability to gain employment at his desired level and had no savings, or assets in his name.
Summary of this case from M.J.K. v. A.L.K.Index No. 301223/2000
02-07-2023
Z.U., Plaintiff, v. F.U., Defendant.
Ordered accordingly.
In Z.U. v. F.U, the Court found Plaintiff experienced extreme hardship and was permanently limited in his career and ability to gain employment at his desired level and had no savings, or assets in his name.
Summary of this case from M.J.K. v. A.L.K.In Z.U. v. F.U., 77 Misc.3d 1234 (A) [Sup, Ct 2023] aff'd NY Slip Op. 05079 [1st Dept 2024], the Court stated, "although the equities seem to dictate outright termination of the support obligation, the Court is unaware of authorities permitting the same where the parties have contracted for lifetime maintenance, and without other circumstances not present here such as a permanent disability."
Summary of this case from M.J.K. v. A.L.K.Full title:Z.U., Plaintiff, v. F.U., Defendant.
Court:Supreme Court, New York County, New York.
Date published: Feb 7, 2023
In Z.U. v. F.U., 77 Misc.3d 1234 (A) [Sup, Ct 2023] aff'd NY Slip Op. 05079 [1st Dept 2024], the Court…