From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zorilla v. Lake James

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 8, 2009
No. 13-09-00085-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00085-CV

Opinion delivered and filed October 8, 2009.

On appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

Before Justices YAÑEZ, BENAVIDES, and VELA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on April 16, 2009. On July 8, 2009, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain her failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file her brief, or file her brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).


Summaries of

Zorilla v. Lake James

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg
Oct 8, 2009
No. 13-09-00085-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Zorilla v. Lake James

Case Details

Full title:MIRTA ZORILLA, Appellant, v. LAKE JAMES RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, INC.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

Citations

No. 13-09-00085-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2009)