From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zoom Imaging Sols. v. Roe

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2022
2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN

10-20-2022

ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY; JON CROSSEN; CORINNE FUERST; ANDREW ALSWEET, KEVIN TOON; JASON PEEBLER; ABIGAIL NEAL; POWER BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY LLC; BRYAN DAVIS; MAURA LOPEZ; JEFFREY ORLANDO; JESSICA HINTZ; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff's ex parte application for an order shortening time and motion for a trial continuance and extension of associated deadlines (Docket Nos. 265 & 265-4) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court will hold the Pretrial Conference on November 7, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. as scheduled. The Pretrial Conference shall be held in person in Courtroom 5, and the parties shall file their pretrial statements in accordance with Local Rule 281. The parties are referred to the court's Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order issued February 14, 2020 (Docket No. 90) for additional information that shall be included in the parties' pretrial statements.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Zoom Imaging Sols. v. Roe

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 20, 2022
2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Zoom Imaging Sols. v. Roe

Case Details

Full title:ZOOM IMAGING SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. EDWARD ROE; MAXWELL RAMSAY…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 20, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-01544 WBS KJN (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2022)