From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zook v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2015
Case No. CV 13-7286-DDP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-7286-DDP (JEM)

05-06-2015

BRADLEY ZOOK, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice. DATED: May 6, 2015

/s/_________

DEAN D. PREGERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Zook v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2015
Case No. CV 13-7286-DDP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Zook v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:BRADLEY ZOOK, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-7286-DDP (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)