Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01584-MSK-MEH
06-25-2012
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on June 25, 2012.
Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction [filed June 18, 2012; docket #2] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and 65(a) and with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. Rule 5(d) provides that all papers required to be served include a certificate of service, but the present motion contains no such certificate. Rule 65(a) provides that "[t]he court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party"; however, there is no indication that the Plaintiff has notified Defendants of its request for preliminary injunction. Local Rule 7.1A requires that the Court refrain from considering any motion, other than a motion brought pursuant to Rules 12 or 56, unless the movant certifies that it has conferred with the opposing party regarding the disputed matter; here, the Plaintiff has provided no such certification.
There is no indication in the motion that it is brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b).