From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zirn v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 4, 1940
31 N.E.2d 43 (N.Y. 1940)

Opinion

Argued November 13, 1940

Decided December 4, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, WILSON, J.

I. Maurice Wormser and Adolph Feldblum for appellant.

Neil P. Cullom and Henry W. Steingarten for respondents.


Plaintiff was found guilty of contempt of court and judgment entered dismissing his complaint. This was a final order. Neither the court at Special Term, nor the official referee, made any order of which the provisions were violated by plaintiff. The official referee properly refused to make such an order since he was presiding at an examination before trial and not trying any issues in a motion, action or proceeding referred to him under section 117 of the Judiciary Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 30).

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the order of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

The motion to dismiss the appeal should be denied.

LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, SEARS, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Zirn v. Bradley

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 4, 1940
31 N.E.2d 43 (N.Y. 1940)
Case details for

Zirn v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL ZIRN, Appellant, v. CLIFTON N. BRADLEY et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 4, 1940

Citations

31 N.E.2d 43 (N.Y. 1940)
31 N.E.2d 43

Citing Cases

Matter of Luckenbach

The separate provisions for the two phases of an accounting is indicative of the knowledge possessed by the…

Glenmark, Inc. v. Carity

Punishment for contempt consisting of disobedience to a mandate of the court depends on the existence of such…