From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zipser v. Dumars

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Feb 19, 1946
188 Misc. 237 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1946)

Opinion

February 19, 1946.

Friedman Scherer for defendant.

Maurice Whitebook and Irving S. Freedman for plaintiff.


Motion to change place of trial from the county of New York to the county of Nassau is denied.

In my opinion, the action to enforce the civil liability imposed by the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.) for the exaction of rent above the amount permitted is not an action for a penalty which must be brought in the county where the cause of action arose, as provided by section 184 of the Civil Practice Act. In any event, no proof is presented to the court upon this application as to where the cause of action arose. Although it appears that the premises involved in the action are located in Nassau County, there is no proof that the payment of rent was made in Nassau County or that the acts constituting the demand for or the contracting for the payment of such allegedly excessive rent occurred in that county.

Submit order.


Summaries of

Zipser v. Dumars

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Feb 19, 1946
188 Misc. 237 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1946)
Case details for

Zipser v. Dumars

Case Details

Full title:JAMES A. ZIPSER, Plaintiff, v. GERALD DUMARS, Defendant

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: Feb 19, 1946

Citations

188 Misc. 237 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1946)
64 N.Y.S.2d 654

Citing Cases

Tabor v. Ford

The court cites Huntington v. Attrill, supra, and many other cases. Other decisions to the same effect are:…

Jaylo Realty Corp. v. Bobnor Realty Corp.

In this court's opinion this action does not relate to real estate, nor is this action one for a penalty…