From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Zippilli-Arnstein v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2022
22-cv-09504 (JLR) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-09504 (JLR)

11-10-2022

MARY ZIPPILLI-ARNSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


SCHEDULING ORDER

JENNIFER L. ROCHON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By separate Order today, the Court is referring this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation on any motion for judgment on the pleadings. In accordance with this District's Standing Order governing challenges to denials of social security benefits (see In re: Mots. J. Pleadings Social Sec. Cases, 16-MC-0171), the following briefing schedule applies:

• Within 90 days of service, the Commissioner must serve and file the Electronic Certified Administrative Record (e-CAR), which will constitute the Commissioner's answer, or otherwise move against the complaint.
• If Plaintiff wishes to file a motion for judgment on the pleadings, Plaintiff must do so within 60 days of the date on which the e-CAR was filed. The motion must contain a full recitation of the relevant facts and a full description of the underlying administrative proceeding.
• The Commissioner must file an answering brief within 60 days of the filing of Plaintiff's motion.
• Plaintiff may file a reply within 21 days thereafter.
In addition, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge.

If both parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant must, within two weeks of the date of this Order, file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, a copy of which is attached to this Order (and also available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/node/754). If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before the undersigned.

If either party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, within two weeks of the date of this Order advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. There will be no adverse consequences if the parties do not consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Zippilli-Arnstein v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 10, 2022
22-cv-09504 (JLR) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Zippilli-Arnstein v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:MARY ZIPPILLI-ARNSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

22-cv-09504 (JLR) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 10, 2022)