Opinion
21 Civ. 7429 (AKH)
03-17-2022
ZIONESS MOVEMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. THE LAWFARE PROJECT, INC., Defendant.
POST-ARGUMENT ORDER
ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On Mach 17, 2022 I held oral argument for Defendant's motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 17). For the reasons stated on the record and set forth below, I denied the motion.
Plaintiff never made or signed any agreement to arbitrate with Defendant and cannot be bound to arbitrate this dispute absent consent. See Hines v. Overstock, 380 Fed. App'x 22, 24-25 (2d Cir. 2010). Defendant's veil piercing theory is insufficient to compel arbitration. See Boroditskiy v. European Specialities LLC, 314 F.Supp.3d 487, 494 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (citing Am. Fuel Corp. v. Utah Energy Dev. Co., \T1 F.3d 130, 134 (2d Cir, 1997)). Likewise, Defendant's direct benefits estoppel theory is unavailing, as Plaintiffs claim does not depend on Berman's employment contract and Plaintiff was not a third party beneficiary of that contract. See See Am. Bureau of Shipping v. Tencara Shipyard S.P.A., 170 F.3d 349, 353 (2d Cir. 1999).
Defendant is ordered to file its Answer by April 7, 2022. The parties are hereby ordered to appear for a status conference on May 20, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. By May 18, 2022 at 12:00, the parties shall submit jointly their proposed case management plan, for approval at the status conference. The status conference will be held via the call-in number:
Call-in Number: 888-363-4749
Access code: 7518680
Finally, no later than May 18, 2022, at 12:00 p.m., the parties shall jointly submit to the court (via the email address HellersteinNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov) a list of all counsel expected to appear on the record, along with their contact information. The Clerk shall terminate ECF No. 17.
SO ORDERED.